Re: virus: Defining an Axiom

Martz (martz@martz.demon.co.uk)
Tue, 4 Feb 1997 21:12:56 +0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Lior Golgher: "Re: virus: Good idea"
Previous message: Tadeusz Niwinski: "virus: Re: Anti-Virus Protection"
In reply to: David Rosdeitcher: "RE: virus: Re: Anti-Virus Protection"
Next in thread: zaimoni@ksu.edu: "Re: virus: Defining an Axiom"

On Mon, 3 Feb 1997, "Corey A. Cook" <cookcore@esuvm.emporia.edu> wrote:
>Suppose that someone proves an axiom. What is it then?

What it always was. Something else.

-- 
Martz
martz@martz.demon.co.uk

For my public key, <mailto:m.traynor@ic.ac.uk> with 'Send public key' as subject
an automated reply will follow.

No more random quotes.

Next message: Lior Golgher: "Re: virus: Good idea"
Previous message: Tadeusz Niwinski: "virus: Re: Anti-Virus Protection"
In reply to: David Rosdeitcher: "RE: virus: Re: Anti-Virus Protection"
Next in thread: zaimoni@ksu.edu: "Re: virus: Defining an Axiom"