Re: virus: Pot
Thu, 19 Dec 96 14:07:02 GMT

XYZ wrote:

> > From:
> > > Pot is not a hallucinogen. Even if it was, hallucinogenic doesn't mean
> > > harmful. Take the effects of the hallucinogenic, Peyote. No harm has
> > > ever came from that hallucinogenic.
> > I'm sorry to point this out, but Pot *is* a hallucinogen. I'll vouch
> > for that on personal experience, as well as fact.
> Your experience is not fact.

I think you got the wrong end of the stick there. I was adding together in
the same sentence that I have experienced hallucinations whilst under the
influence of pot, and it is also a fact that the medical grouping of
pot is under Psychedelics/hallucinogens (the others including Narcotics,
stimulants etc...)

> No one's experience is fact...unless it can
> be validated with evidence. Maybe for you (and you alone) it is a
> hallucinogen, but that might have something to do with a quirk in your
> personal chemistry (allergy?)

If I were allergic to it, I'd be dead by now :)

Richard Jones
"We are the New Breed,
We are the Future."