Re: virus: Why religious?

zaimoni@ksu.edu
Tue, 3 Dec 1996 09:07:24 -0600 (CST)


On Tue, 19 Nov 1996, ken sartor wrote:

> At 05:55 PM 11/18/96 -0600, zaimoni@ksu.edu wrote:
> >On Tue, 28 Aug 1956, David Leeper wrote:
> >
> >> > As far as I know [in the serious mythos,
> >> > not Hollywood/American froth], the Devil
> >> > makes a point of staying as far away from
> >> > Hell as possible. [Something like: escaped
> >> > convicts don't really like walking into
> >> > prison!] His NT title is "Prince of the
> >> > Powers of the Air", NOT "Prince of the Powers
> >> > of Hell".
> >>
> >> ...and, accordng to "The Golden Bough", Jesus's
> >> his birthday was orginally Jan 20th! It was
> >> moved to Dec 25th in order to take over the
> >> celebrations of, drum roll please, Lucifer!,
> >> the Sun God.
> >
> >H.P. Lovecraft reference!
> >
> >=====
> >
> >Some research on the pages under
> >
> >http://members.aol.com/gkilli/home/index.html
> >
> >turned up fairly effective ultraliteralist reasoning that Jan 20th is a
> >plausible CONCEPTION date. [This isn't the author's conclusion; he wants
> >another month.]
>
> Just out of perverse curiousity, if God has a child with a women,
> would the pregnancy be unusual? Lenght of time, pain of birth,
> whatever...???

Besides the unbroken hymen during the pregnancy?

Hmm...while the Word isn't known for typical standards of decency [at
least one passage in the NT is effectively hard-core pornography,
without pictures], I fail to recall further details.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/ Towards the conversion of data into information....
/
/ Kenneth Boyd
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////