: >If Absolute Truth is dependent upon Objective Reality,
: >isn't Absolute Truth really Relative Truth, being true
: >relative to Objective Reality?
:
: Yes, even if it was possible to have an infinite number of true
: statements about OR, it wouldn't be absolute because the truth
: is a relation between the statement's meaning and objective reality.
Ok. So I'll call this relative truth TRTH, Total Relative TrutH.
Next question. Given that OR is in a constant state of flux,
stars spinning, atoms moving, etc., wouldn't TRTH be in a constant
state of flux as well? Using ! to represent subscript and t to
represent a time index, we have:
TRTH!t = TRTH!t + n, for n = 0 (of course).
TRTH!t != TRTH!t + n, for n != 0.
...where n can be any number.
Thus, we have an infinite number of TRTHs and each TRTH has
an infinite number of true statements.
The same would hold for OR:
OR!t = OR!t + n, for n = 0 (of course).
OR!t != OR!t + n, for n != 0.
...where n can be any number.
Does this seem reasonable?
-- David Leeper dleeper@gte.net Homo Deus http://home1.gte.net/dleeper/index.htm 1 + 1 != 2 http://home1.gte.net/dleeper/CMath.html