Re: virus: Is the term "meme" necessary?

John Porter (jporter@btg.com)
Wed, 15 May 1996 09:44:06 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: John Porter: "Re: virus: No meglomaniacs in my mailbox"
Previous message: Tom Loeber: "virus: Subscription canceled."
Maybe in reply to: Richard Brodie: "virus: Is the term "meme" necessary?"
Next in thread: Tadeusz Niwinski: "Re: virus: Is the term "meme" necessary?"

Tadeusz Niwinski wrote:
>
> m = a * W (m = mass, a = acceleration, W = weight)
>

Wow, the laws of physics are very different on TeTa.
How do you survive here?

John Porter
jporter@btg.com

Next message: John Porter: "Re: virus: No meglomaniacs in my mailbox"
Previous message: Tom Loeber: "virus: Subscription canceled."
Maybe in reply to: Richard Brodie: "virus: Is the term "meme" necessary?"
Next in thread: Tadeusz Niwinski: "Re: virus: Is the term "meme" necessary?"