>coincidence is often the only rebuttal for "mystical phenomena".
The only _fact_ present in 'mystical phenomena' is that they were _perceived_. And as subjective information, so far, so long, they have remained, with nothing corroborating their existence in instrumentally observed reality.
Coincidence has nothing (or very little) to do with rebutting such perceptions.
But no mystic really wants to know how he or she really perceives things.... That is the rebuttal.