Re: virus: Re: Technology (was manifest science)

Brett Robertson (BrettMan35@webtv.net)
Wed, 2 Jun 1999 17:27:57 -0500 (EST) 

--WebTV-Mail-1064825757-1390
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

Redundancy, self reference, self assertion, self affirmation, and empowered action (rather than chance action and contingent, paradoxical, forever unresolvable self-and-other REaction)...?

Brett Lane Robertson
Indiana, USA
http://www.window.to/mindrec
MindRecreation Metaphysical Assn.
BIO: http://members.theglobe.com/bretthay ...........
Put your item up for auction! Bid on hot opportunities! Click HERE to view great deals!:
http://www.utrade.com/index.htm?MID=59876 

--WebTV-Mail-1064825757-1390
Content-Disposition: Inline
Content-Type: Message/RFC822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

Received: from mailsorter-102-2.iap.bryant.webtv.net (209.240.198.99) by
	postoffice-132.iap.bryant.webtv.net; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 11:12:29 -0700
	(PDT)

Return-Path: <owner-virus@lucifer.com>
Received: from maxwell.kumo.com (maxwell.kumo.com [198.161.199.205]) by 
	mailsorter-102-2.iap.bryant.webtv.net (8.8.8/ms.graham.14Aug97)
	with ESMTP id LAA15265; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 11:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by maxwell.kumo.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id
	LAA15233 for virus-outgoing; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 11:47:55 -0600
Message-Id: <199906021747.NAA14073@mail1.lig.bellsouth.net> From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net> To: virus@lucifer.com
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 12:49:05 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: virus: Re: Technology (was manifest science) In-reply-to: <199905021152a6936>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01b) Sender: owner-virus@lucifer.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com 
From:           	"psypher" <overload@fastmail.ca>
Subject:        	Re: virus: Re: Technology (was manifest science)
To:             	virus@lucifer.com
Date sent:      	Wed,  2 Jun 1999 11:52:48 -0400 (EDT)
Send reply to:  	virus@lucifer.com

> At the conclusion of a very thorough post was written:
>
> > The analogy to evolution is weak. Conscious direction of the process
> > makes the "evolution" of technology something rather different from
> > the evolution of organisms, or molecules.. it's hard enough to make
> > the analogy between memetic and biological evolution useful, despite
> > the (in my opinion) greater similarity..
> >
> > -Engan
>
> ...what is it, do you suppose, which differentiates the process of
> our consciousness from any other?
>
Dynamic interrelation and recursivity? Self(and other)-awareness, self(and other)-consciousness and self(and other)-reference?
>
> -psypher
> ______________________________________________________________________
> http://fastmail.ca Fastmail's Free web based email for Canadians
>

--WebTV-Mail-1064825757-1390--