> Websters uses the definition "a manner of accomplishing a task..."
> (especially regarding the way knowledge may be applied).
>
> My understanding allows that a technology is a NATURAL process.
I agree. But I am wondering if this is the best word to use to describe the process.
> Eyes, immune systems, etc. (while seeming to be types of "tools") are
> more the PRODUCT of a technology than a technology proper. Thus,
> *specialization* might be the technology which produces such biological
> products.
I would say that all the 'tools' we get from 'technology' are specializations. I think that our 'tools' that we have made fall under the same proccess that made our biological 'tools' (and i guess, our bodies). The proccess seems similar enough.