Re: virus: Will and Force (correction)

Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Wed, 19 May 1999 18:03:25 -0500 

From:           	BrettMan35@webtv.net (Brett Robertson)
Date sent:      	Wed, 19 May 1999 01:49:25 -0500 (EST)
To:             	virus@lucifer.com
Subject:        	Re: virus: Will and Force (correction)
Send reply to:  	virus@lucifer.com

> The following was mis-stated in my original post (below):
>
>   Will is the supposed negation of chance; but the affirmation of
> chance is order (in this way, will opposes order and this is not
> necessitated through chance but by force):
>
> This should read:
>
> Will is the supposed negation of chance [which suggests necessary
> existence and so order, indirectly]; but the [direct] affirmation of
> EXISTENCE is order...
>
> Brett Lane Robertson
> Indiana, USA
> http://www.window.to/mindrec
> MindRecreation Metaphysical Assn.
> BIO: http://members.theglobe.com/bretthay
> ...........
> Put your item up for auction! Bid on hot opportunities! Click HERE to
> view great deals!:
> http://www.utrade.com/index.htm?MID=59876
>
>
I have had the dubious "pleasure' of subscribing to Brett's "Mindwreck" list; while there I found out, from Brett himself, that

(1) He is not gainfully employed (and in my opinion is probably surviving on a mental disability stipend). 

(2)  He has no sex life
(3)  He has no social life
(4)  He believes that (1), (2) and (3) grant him infallibility (his exact
words were, "...I can't be wrong...). This is typical of egocentric, messianic, solipsistic or megalomanic processing. (5) He is addicted to serial negation, negating negation, and negating the negated negation, among other negations (in which he himself has a tendency to get lost).
(6) When you untie al the quasi-Gordian nugatory knots in his pseudo-psycho-philosophical screeds, they do not map onto any remotely feasible intersubjective reality. (7) His posts are typically tortuously convoluted and vaguely malevolent or threatening warnings of the horrors of error, unconsciousness or moral deficiency, all of which he circuitously assures all and sundry will befall them if they do not agree with him completely (supposing they have the patience to untangle his syntax to the point where it can be unambiguously identified for the drivel it is). This is known in the clinical literature as hebephrenia (word-salad), and is commonly found coexisting with the megalomania (and subsequent paranoia he feels about those who resent him for being the "chosen" one - he has spoken of himself in christlike terms -"no place to lay my head" on Mindwreck) in schizophrenics.
My BA is in philosophy, and my MA is in Humanities Interdisciplinary (philisophy, psychology, anthropology, sociology), so I am more than qualified to pronounce his bizarre faux-logical meanderings as the dreck they are. If I were him, I wouldn'y brag about an MA in education (supposing he was able to obtain one before schizophrenia kicked in), as that is a lightweight degree akin to a degree in social work.