> Mr. Hermit, tell me please, do you think that "truths" are qualities
> of the universe or _descriptions_ of the qualities of the universe?
> And can you see the difference?
...I'd like to present option 3 - the universe doess not have qualities as such, it's fundamentally undefined [an infinite system without limits, the sum of all possible orders] and qualities, truths, attributes etc. are impositions placed upon the undifferentiated flux [Kant's manifold] by the process of consciousness.
-psypher
Because other than that, I don't
> think we're disagreeing about anything whatsoever and as a result I
> don't really see a need to agrue with you any further.
>
> You seem to be saying that when truths aren't true anymore they stop
> being truths. Which I agree with. You see, I asked you once how
> you'd change the maxim to relect that and now I'll ask excatly the
> same thing over again one more time and see what happens:
>
>>But since it seems your real problem with the statement: >> >>>> All statements of truth are embedded a particular frame of >>>> reference from which they cannot be separated without becoming >>>> suppositions. >> >>was with the word "supposition", can I ask, why are we even having
>> >>More to the point: Would you care to offer another word (or words)
>>and yours?