From: Veedma@aol.com Date sent: Wed, 12 May 1999 20:54:54 EDT Subject: Re: virus: maxims and ground rules To: virus@lucifer.com Send reply to: virus@lucifer.com
> In a message dated 5/12/99 5:51:38 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> joedees@bellsouth.net writes:
>
> > Dave Pape <davepape@dial.pipex.com>
> > Subject: Re: virus: maxims and ground rules
> > Send reply to: virus@lucifer.com
> >
> > > At 18:01 12/05/99 EDT, you wrote:
> > > >In a message dated 5/12/99 2:50:39 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> > > >joedees@bellsouth.net writes:
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > What about "Truth is a chameleon, assuming coloration
> > > >> > > complementary to its context"?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > What about accept that Truth is an illusion
> > > >> >
> > > >> Do you consider that statement true? ;~)
> > > >
> > > >>Of course, but then, I am highly irrational
> > >
> > > Mind you, if there's no such thing as truth, you'd EXPECT the statement
> to
> > > be flawed in some sense, wouldn't you? So it being flawed in that way
> must
> > > make it the truiest thuthy truth ever.
> > >
> > Truth is an interpretation; therefore, as Godel reminds us, it must
> > be either incorrect or incomplete.
> >
> >
> And a chameleon is always whole.
>
No, a chameleon has no color of its own. Remove it from all
context and it disappears.