RE: virus: Re: META: topical rules

Snow Leopard (juliet784@hotmail.com)
Sun, 09 May 1999 10:30:09 PDT

>Snow Leopard -- I think you missed David's point; which was that,
>historically, every debate on Christian appologetics on Virus has
>yielded nothing. Basically, the same arguments are rehashed with each
>new Christian, and nobody here learns anything, while the Christian
>goes away with a bad taste in their mouth... I for one am all for
>changing that record, and a good way to do it would be to declare that
>Christian Apologetics, per say, are off topic. Discussions with
>Christians, on the other hand, are exactly what this group needs more
>of.

Well, you know what? I have no intention of quitting this list. I'm in it for the long haul. You'll "enlighten" us over time, or we've "enlighten" you. I've been meaning to write on some of your topics as well- they're fairly fascinating, but because of everyone poking us with separate questions just because we stand up and say "We're different", I haven't been able to.

If you'd like to limit stuff, I think it should be fair. I'm sure you think it should be fair, too, just on a different definition. I'm willing to avoid saying some stuff, but whether or not I repeat Lord/liar/lunatic or the rest of it, just remember, I haven't actually goten one response with enough guts to give a fair answer.



Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com