RE: virus: humyn experience

James Veverka (headbands@webtv.net)
Fri, 7 May 1999 19:10:40 -0400 (EDT)

--WebTV-Mail-749639936-1738
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

Political correctness mumbo jumbo is what it is. Reminds me of Beavis and Butthead's going to a meeting of "Wimyn Power" feminists.

--WebTV-Mail-749639936-1738
Content-Disposition: Inline
Content-Type: Message/RFC822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

Received: from mailsorter-101-1.iap.bryant.webtv.net (209.240.198.97) by
	postoffice-152.iap.bryant.webtv.net; Fri, 7 May 1999 16:07:11 -0700
	(PDT)

Return-Path: <owner-virus@lucifer.com>
Received: from maxwell.kumo.com (maxwell.kumo.com [198.161.199.205]) by
	mailsorter-101-1.iap.bryant.webtv.net (8.8.8/ms.graham.14Aug97)
	with ESMTP id QAA21196; Fri, 7 May 1999 16:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by maxwell.kumo.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id
	QAA26037 for virus-outgoing; Fri, 7 May 1999 16:38:45 -0600
Message-ID: <01BE983A.86846020.sodom@ma.ultranet.com> From: Sodom <sodom@ma.ultranet.com>
To: "'virus@lucifer.com'" <virus@lucifer.com> Subject: RE: virus: humyn experience
Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 03:34:08 -0700
Organization: SLF
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-virus@lucifer.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com

Well, I know I am not supposed to be an ass - BUT - THAT IS A JOKE

c'mon - do you jump on every bandwagon in the hopes of not offending people who have modified a word to appease their own sense of self worth? I suppose you wont type the word "bananna" because the press book says some people look at that word as sexual? Human's are a species, not a sex. This is like the guy getting fired for using the word - "Niggardly" - a word with no racist definition or connotation, but sounds like the word "nigger". I tell you what, when you get an androgenous language all worked out, and all the world signed on with no-one getting offended, then I'll take it seriously. Until then, I'm trashing that concept - a bad meme to start.

Bill Roh

On Friday, May 07, 1999 2:32 PM, Richard Aynesworthy [SMTP:overload@fastmail.ca] wrote:
> ...no special definition, I've just encountered a number of people
> who feel that the traditional spelling (huMAN) is exclusionary. I'm
> not done thinking about how I feel about it, but I'd rather bother
> people with alternate spellings than bother them by seeming (at least
> from their perspective) to discount their gender.
>
> -psypher
>
>
> > Richard Aynesworthy,
> >
> > I've noticed that you repeatedly using the word "humyn." Does this
> > alternate spelling of "human" denote a special definition? If you've
> > already posted on that topic, just point me to that (those)
> > post(s) in the archive. Thanks.
> >
> > -KMO
> ______________________________________________________________________
> http://fastmail.ca Fastmail's Free web based email for Canadians
>

--WebTV-Mail-749639936-1738--