UEA <A.Rousso@uea.ac.uk> wrote:
>It doesn't happen very often (I've never seen it personally)
>but last Saturday's Guardian - the "Editor" section - had
>mention of the word meme, in a matter of fact way, used just
>as a normal word, with no explanations or apologies. It even
>used the word metameme (although this word is not in the
>shorter OED). Admittedly, the Editor is not the Guardian
>proper, just a collection of other media; the original
>publication is a Canadian magazine called "Adbusters" and
>the article was written by Kalle Lasn.
That article is getting a lot of reprinting, I just saw it again in a Graphic Arts Journal last weekend as well. Most of the original is up at: http://www.adbusters.org/blueprint/blueprint.html
-Tim Rhodes
>
>
>
>===============================================================
>This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
>Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
>For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
>see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
>