In message <c5e6edfa.36cc669f@aol.com>, MemeLab@aol.com writes
>In a message dated 2/18/99 8:37:57 AM Central Standard Time, MemeLab@aol.com
>writes in response to Robin:
>
><< BTW, this seems to be a common response on this list. If you don't agree
>with
> somebody, call their position a "semantics game". You aren't the first
>person
> to do so this week. Such an accusation makes it at least as possible that
>you
> didn't understand, or didn't want to understand, as that I was merely
>"playing
> a semantics game". Consider more possibilities.
>
> -Jake>>
>
>After looking back over this, I don't think this is what you were
necessarily
>doing. It just sounded a little similar to what Reed definitely was
doing,
>and I was a little annoyed at that.
OK, please ignore what I said about this in the one I just sent.
>I still don't see that there is a
>necessary distinction between a "material" and a "social" world view,
much
>less inconsistencies between them.
See my replies to both yourself and David.
-- Robin