Bill wrote:
[snipped some very good stuff]
>I think what I am getting at is that the levels are unnecessary. Anyone who
>is aware that "nothing is simple" can find ways to make multiple
conflicting
>systems function together if they wish too.
And that awareness is the key isn't it?
Look over the pass week or so, or just watch from here on out as the arguments unfold and keep a tally of who is claiming "everything is/or can be simple" and who is not. The results are quite informative.
-Prof. Tim