On 2/10/99 16:30, Richard Brodie said this-
>I've never seen this argued, but one could hypothesize that following
>astrological advice fits nicely into game theory if the pseudo-random
>decision process is used with a decent probability distribution among
>weighted alternative courses of action.
Every time an astrologer (or a NLP'r...) claims that their 'thing' 'works' they are arguing from precisely this stance.
It don't make any of 'em real. It may make 'em memetic, though....
morbius@channel1.com
wade_smith@harvard.edu
**************************************