You wrote:
My original comments were directed to the second question, primarily.
>Imagination is then used to interpret the states...put them into a visual
>context. One can believe these interpretations to represent or
>misrepresent reality.
True enough. But the interesting thing to me about these subjective states
is that whether one chooses to "believe" the intuitional revelations that
come with them or not, the actual physical states exist and can be
reproduced clinically. I think it begs the question, What value do/did these
states have in the evolution of the species?
The error one makes in dismissing such states as simply chemical reactions
or acts of imagination is on par with neglecting the role of the orgasm in
the human reproductive cycle.
>Make sense?
Much more. If I may ask, are you still on the Church of Virus mailing list?
If so, would you be adverse to taking this conversation back onto the list?
-Tim
.
SG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"My mother was a spore"
--quote taken from "The Lives of Rich & Famous Gametophytes"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>