|
Saints: dead or alive? |
|
| Should living persons be eligible for Virian illumination (sainthood)? |
| |
| Yes | 1.21 |  (1.33%) |
| No | 89.30 | (98.67%) |
|
| decisiveness | | (88.10%) |
| unvoted equity | | (9.49%) |
| voted equity | | (90.51%) |
|
| 29 Voters: Hermit, Ophis, Casey, rhinoceros, David Lucifer, the.bricoleur, Walter Watts, Sat, prometheus, Kid-A, ElvenSage, opsima, michelle, outlawpoet, DrSebby, Flux, MoEnzyme, Matt Arnold, Alex Future Bokov, DJ dAndroid, Drakeo Vortex, chippedlogic, Pabreetzio, simul, pickler, goomba, teh, letheomaniac, Bohandez, |
| voter | voted for | comment |
| Ophis | Yes
| As long as sainthood can be removed if the living person decides to alter his/her course in a direction that would be judged to be incompatible with the CoV virtues. |
| Casey | No
| I'd rather the person no longer be alive in order that he/she will not do something that the CoV may perceive as not affording them the honor of being illuminated. |
| rhinoceros | No
| We are only humans and therefore susceptible to fads, especially in the short term. |
| David Lucifer | No
| Too many problems with illuminating living people. Let's come up with a differerent honour. |
| the.bricoleur | No
| no comment |
| Walter Watts | No
| no comment |
| Sat | private | no comment |
| prometheus | private | no comment |
| Kid-A | No
| no comment |
| ElvenSage | Yes
| no comment |
| opsima | No
| no comment |
| michelle | private | no comment |
| outlawpoet | Yes
| no comment |
| DrSebby | Yes
| no comment |
| Flux | Yes
| no comment |
| MoEnzyme | No
| no comment |
| Matt Arnold | Yes
| It seems fitting that a progressive, modern religion should emphasize the future over the past. Let's make eligible hypothetical people who aren't born yet, like the first artificial intelligence. |
| Alex Future Bokov | Yes
| Don't let it ever be said I lack ambition. |
| DJ dAndroid | No
| Because it should be an "un-removeable" honor, and what if they eventually prove unworthy? 15 years ago I never thought Skinny_Puppy would let me down but... :p |
| Drakeo Vortex | private | no comment |
| chippedlogic | private | no comment |
| Pabreetzio | private | no comment |
| simul | Yes
| no comment |
| pickler | No
| no comment |
| Hermit | No
| If for no other reason but that a living person still has the ability to embarrass. Safely dead saints are much more predictable. |
| goomba | No
| no comment |
| teh | Yes
| no comment |
| letheomaniac | No
| Too inconvenient to continuously update the bio I think. |
| Bohandez | private | no comment |
|
|
