What is your stance on the statement that every living organism on earth today(including humans) has evolved from very simple lifeforms that lived billions of years ago.
It is necessarily true.	1.03	(1.07%)
The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	34.33	(35.65%)
It is probably true.	60.91	(63.25%)
I don't know.	0.00	(0.00%)
It is probably not true.	0.00	(0.00%)
The overwhelming evidence contradicts it.	0.00	(0.00%)
It is impossible.	0.02	(0.02%)
decisiveness		(26.58%)
unvoted equity		(3.71%)
voted equity		(96.29%)
67 Voters: Kid-A, David Lucifer, JerryLee, ElvenSage, goomba, Joe Dees, rhinoceros, JD, DrSebby, Ophis, Kalkor, Sat, Cassidy McGurk, Walter Watts, prometheus, Hermit, Lukian The Wizard, Drakeo Vortex, referent, Hermitess, Flux, MoEnzyme, nrv8, outlawpoet, Tywick, Blunderov, Kharin, Feagwath, Rhysenn, RavenBlack, opsima, the.bricoleur, Warlock, Smucker, RenegadeSocial, alahzred, lotusfox, Mermaid, Casey, Wonko, se7en, michelle, simul, Aryn Ravenlocke, metahuman, Galt, Gunit, Nikolai, Atheist Crusader, LenKen, Matt Arnold, Heretician, Alex Future Bokov, DJ dAndroid, Cydonia, subdermal, chippedlogic, Pabreetzio, Azareph, Jorrit, pickler, archangelsin, Fox, teh, deusdiabolus, ObfuscatoryAlias, Bohandez,
voter	voted for	comment
David Lucifer	private	no comment
Mermaid	private	no comment
JD	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	no comment
Casey	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	no comment
Wonko	It is necessarily true.	It is the only thinkable way life could have started. Even if you count gods in, as they must have somehow started too. I wonder why this simple logic is not wider known.
se7en	private	no comment
michelle	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	no comment
Lukian The Wizard	It is probably true.	Evidence goes both ways, the Xian evidence is a shocker
MoEnzyme	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	of course.
simul	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	Checkboxes ARGH! http://www.electionmethods.org/ http://www.approvalvoting.org/
Aryn Ravenlocke	private	no comment
metahuman	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	Evolution is observable.
Galt	It is necessarily true.	no comment
DrSebby	It is necessarily true.	since in theory nothing can be "absolutely proven" outside of simple math, i feel that is just a linguistic glitch. while i cant "prove" that the sun is a ball of burning gas, there is no remaining alternate solution that even comes close to being reason
Nikolai	It is necessarily true.	Whether or not what we think about evolutionary history is correct, evolution is something that we can actively observe happening. It is possible that our observations are wrong, but the chance is so slim that it makes no odds.
Atheist Crusader	private	no comment
LenKen	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	Microevolution can be seen in action with viruses, such as HIV, so it’s an empirically verifiable fact. And macroevolution is overwhelmingly probable, considering the evidence from the fossil record and modern genetics.
Matt Arnold	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	no comment
Joe Dees	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	no comment
Drakeo Vortex	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	no comment
JerryLee	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	no comment
Heretician	private	no comment
Alex Future Bokov	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	no comment
DJ dAndroid	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	no comment
Cydonia	It is probably true.	Nothing is fact. There is overwhelming evidence, but I would feel uneasy calling it a fact.
subdermal	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	no comment
chippedlogic	It is necessarily true.	no comment
Hermit	It is probably true.	What is the limit for "living organism"? If it involves DNA then "overwhelming evidence" would be more appropriate. But what of virii and prions? They all may not have instantiated 10^9 + years ago.
Pabreetzio	It is necessarily true.	I find it a fundamental principle as much as gravity.
Azareph	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	Nothing should be considered "necessarily true"
Jorrit	private	no comment
pickler	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	no comment
archangelsin	I don't know.	no comment
Fox	It is probably true.	The plausibility given to evolution in both theory and with what we see and experience is very hard to dismiss. I for one am in favor with it's logical suggestibility, based on observation.
teh	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	no comment
deusdiabolus	It is probably true.	no comment
ObfuscatoryAlias	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	no comment
Bohandez	The overwhelming evidence supports it as a scientific fact.	no comment