Same sex marriage |
Should the marriage of same-sex couples be given equal recognition, status and rights by society? |
| |
yes | 90.67 | (100.00%) |
no | 0.00 | (0.00%) |
not sure | 0.00 | (0.00%) |
|
decisiveness | | (90.67%) |
unvoted equity | | (9.33%) |
voted equity | | (90.67%) |
|
45 Voters: the.bricoleur, grungebunny, Hermit, Gods Imaginary Friend, David Lucifer, BadGenesBetterMemes, Casey, prometheus, Alex Future Bokov, Rhysenn, DrSebby, outlawpoet, MoEnzyme, Walter Watts, knives, theonlygolux, Kid-A, Ophis, DJ dAndroid, ObfuscatoryAlias, ElvenSage, subdermal, Sat, Drakeo Vortex, Lee, chippedlogic, fishsuit, Pabreetzio, simul, pickler, archangelsin, Rumgoat, Fox, goomba, falcox, marie413, Blunderov, teh, deusdiabolus, TrickleCloude, Bass, Stringy, ToReignInHell, letheomaniac, Bohandez, |
voter | voted for | comment |
David Lucifer | yes
| no comment |
BadGenesBetterMemes | yes
| no comment |
Casey | yes
| no comment |
prometheus | yes
| no comment |
Alex Future Bokov | yes
| Why are these checkboxes instead of radio buttons? Aren't these mutually exclusive answers? |
Rhysenn | yes
| no comment |
DrSebby | yes
| taken to an extreme, i sometimes imagine say, the CEO of TimeWarner getting "married" to the CEO of General Electric for business purposes. without the eternal mystery between the psychologies of men & women, i wonder about diabolical motives. |
outlawpoet | yes
| no comment |
MoEnzyme | yes
| |
knives | no
| no comment |
theonlygolux | yes
| Should marriage exist at all other than as a public recognition of love between two people? |
Kid-A | yes
| no comment |
Ophis | yes
| no comment |
DJ dAndroid | yes
| People have formed bonds together from the beginning, no-one should be denied the right to publically, legally, make it a display. |
ObfuscatoryAlias | yes
| no comment |
ElvenSage | yes
| Of course! |
subdermal | private | no comment |
Sat | yes
| When I marry WW I want to make sure I get his insurance. |
Drakeo Vortex | yes
| yes but i don't think there should be laws for marriage |
Lee | yes
| Why is this even an issue |
fishsuit | yes
| why would anyone mind |
Pabreetzio | yes
| But please, dont call it "marriage" call it a "civil union" :) |
simul | yes
| also multiple-partner marriage. also, no extra status and rights should be given that cannot be given through other means. |
Hermit | yes
| Why should society regard "marriage" (which is a religious custom) as deserving of anything more or less than any other contract between parties? |
grungebunny | yes
| no comment |
the.bricoleur | yes
| no comment |
pickler | yes
| no comment |
chippedlogic | yes
| |
archangelsin | yes
| no comment |
Rumgoat | yes
| Why should heterosexuals be the only ones to suffer? |
goomba | yes
| no comment |
falcox | yes
| Sure, whatever makes them happy |
marie413 | private | no comment |
Blunderov | yes
| Down with religious monopoly of the concept of marriage! |
teh | yes
| no comment |
deusdiabolus | yes
| no comment |
Walter Watts | yes
| When I marry Sat I want to make sure I get his linux box legally after he dies accidentally. |
Gods Imaginary Friend | yes
| no comment |
TrickleCloude | yes
| no comment |
Fox | yes
| I feel that the only peple against this are homophobic's and those who preach some dogma against it; I find both of these views irrational to go so far as labeling people as 'unequal' in society just because people wish to have a 'different' relationship. |
Bass | yes
| no comment |
Stringy | yes
| they should suffer like everybody else. Marriage is a 3 ring circus: engagement ring, wedding ring, and suffer ring. (bud abbot) |
ToReignInHell | yes
| all the ancients accepted that homo- and bi-sexuality was a perfectly natural way to be. It was only when a certain religion came along that everyone decided it wasn't 'natural' |
letheomaniac | yes
| Everyone should have the right to make themselves miserable if they want to. |
Bohandez | private | no comment |
|
|