List rule: flooding |
What is the maximum number of messages a member may send to the mailing list and bbs (combined) in a 24 hour period? [options have changed since the vote opened -- please revote!] |
| |
5 | 0.08 | (0.08%) |
10 | 28.86 | (30.42%) |
15 | 0.16 | (0.17%) |
20 | 0.11 | (0.11%) |
more than 20 | 0.33 | (0.35%) |
no limit | 65.32 | (68.86%) |
|
decisiveness | | (36.46%) |
unvoted equity | | (5.13%) |
voted equity | | (94.87%) |
|
48 Voters: Sat, David Lucifer, Hermit, rhinoceros, Ophis, Hermitess, MoEnzyme, goomba, ElvenSage, Feagwath, Blunderov, referent, Flux, Kharin, DrSebby, outlawpoet, RavenBlack, prometheus, Walter Watts, Kid-A, Cassidy McGurk, the.bricoleur, Warlock, JD, Smucker, Zloduska, Mermaid, opsima, Casey, se7en, Kalkor, michelle, Lukian The Wizard, kirksteele, simul, metahuman, Galt, Atheist Crusader, Matt Arnold, LenKen, Joe Dees, Drakeo Vortex, Alex Future Bokov, DJ dAndroid, chippedlogic, Pabreetzio, pickler, teh, |
voter | voted for | comment |
Mermaid | private | no comment |
opsima | private | no comment |
Casey | no limit
| no comment |
MoEnzyme | 10
| We need to have a limit, any limit. If a special case exists, a person can always get special permission to exceed it. But having no limit tends to invite more abuse. |
se7en | private | no comment |
Kalkor | no limit
| Setting a limit on number of votes assumes that anyone exceeding the limit is doing it maliciously. Not having a limit does NOT invite abuse, just like wearing a low-cut dress does NOT invite rape. |
michelle | no limit
| Content is what's important. I'd personally rather see a limit on how many NEW THREADS can be started. As long as all the spewing and worst-case-scenario crap is confined to one thread, anyone who wishes to ignore it can do so easily. |
Lukian The Wizard | no limit
| I'm all for no limit, except spam /attack protection, although it'd be nice if everyone didn't repost entire or large parts of previous posts. |
kirksteele | no limit
| Vote based on the stipulation that a "post" is something a bit more thatn a montage of cut and pastes from a log, especially when taken out of context. A member's voice need not be limited by the amount of vituperous spewage they are able to post, merely |
simul | 10
| More checkboxes man.... really. It never hurts. I should be able to vote for "5 or 10". Give me liberty or give me death! (or at least another poll) |
Kid-A | 15
| no comment |
metahuman | 5
| no comment |
Galt | 5
| no comment |
Atheist Crusader | private | no comment |
Hermit | no limit
| Content, not volume, matters. |
Matt Arnold | 20
| no comment |
LenKen | 10
| And posts should be limited to original writing only. If a news story is relevant, then explain why it’s relevant and provide a link—and/or include a brief (<250word) quote. It’s all-too-easy to copy and paste other people’s words. So stop it. |
Joe Dees | private | no comment |
Drakeo Vortex | private | no comment |
Blunderov | no limit
| Echo LenKen and Hermit. |
Alex Future Bokov | no limit
| no comment |
DJ dAndroid | no limit
| no limit, common-sense & politeness should rock this! |
chippedlogic | private | no comment |
Pabreetzio | no limit
| no comment |
pickler | no limit
| multiple posters should be dealt with 'if' their posts are considered as abuse or completely off topic and distracting from the main discussion |
teh | 10
| no comment |
|
|