nrv8
Adept
Gender:
Posts: 4 Reputation: 7.61 Rate nrv8
Singularitarian
|
|
an email worth reading.
« on: 2003-08-31 07:55:29 » |
|
from joedees@
Hermit has purposefully imported people who will follow his lead in voting his will and desires, and is now using that mechanism to bludgeon the list into the ideological/political/memetic shape which he has long envisioned. He also utilized an old and tried-and-true mechanism in order to convict me of list flooding; that is, multiple attacks (in which you, beknownst or not, co-operated). When a person (such as myself) refuses to allow their silence to be mistaken for assent, that person can be accused of flooding a list if they simply answer all the attacks directed at them by multiple aggressors, each of which only accumulates a portion of the posts accredited to the defender. Six attackers, each posting six emails, require thirty-six responses from their common target; thus none of them can be accused of list flooding, while their target, who did nothing but respond to emails directed his/her way, gets tagged with a 36-post list flooding charge. Either David is stupid and doesn't understand these dynamics and was taken in by them, or he is malevolent, and used them as an excues to silence me. There is no third alternative available between the horns of this logical either/or dilemma. I, the Virion Cassandra, warned you and prophesied to you (although I take no pleasure in being right) that this would happen, and now it is happening before your very eyes. Now that he feels secure in the opinion that he can dominate it, having abused the previously described device in order to silence his most academically credible adversary, he wishes to retrieve political commentary from its out-of- bounds status so that he may pursue his original intention of morphing this list into an ideologically pure one-note Indymedia-type leftist mouthpiece memetically enthralled tool. And you have aided and abetted him in the pursuit of that list-principle-betraying, and ultimately destroying, partisan goal. I hope that you are proud of yourself; I am most certainly far from proud of you. In fact, I am ashamed - but not of myself. I grieve to see such a nobly conceived enterprise being brought so low, and with the enabling co-operation of people of whom I once thought better of than that.
.
|