logo Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
2024-11-15 02:01:45 CoV Wiki
Learn more about the Church of Virus
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Donations now taken through PayPal

  Church of Virus BBS
  General
  Serious Business

  Maliki's Victory
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Reply Notify of replies Send the topic Print 
   Author  Topic: Maliki's Victory  (Read 692 times)
Salamantis
Neophyte
*****

Posts: 2845
Reputation: 0.00



I'm a llama!

View Profile E-Mail
Maliki's Victory
« on: 2008-05-14 03:42:39 »
Reply with quote

[[ author reputation (0.00) beneath threshold (3)... display message ]]

Report to moderator   Logged
MoEnzyme
Anarch
*****

Gender: Male
Posts: 2256
Reputation: 3.53
Rate MoEnzyme



infidel lab animal

View Profile WWW
Maliki's Failing Charade; sponsored by US
« Reply #1 on: 2008-05-14 14:26:33 »
Reply with quote

I've noticed a continuing pattern of bait-and-switch among the deluded neo-con ditto-heads in regards to the "successes" in Iraq; which our resident troll dutifully pastes into our forums. First off they cite some new military "victory" as evidence of both military and political victory. Of course military victory in Iraq is as abundant as it was in the Vietnam war. The US military victories there were real and continuous, and all lead to the same conclusion, the humiliation, defeat, and international failure of the US in southeast Asia.

Once again we are seeing military victories in Iraq, but to be precise, they aren't Iraqi victories, but rather US victories. Maliki's military power remains decidedly impotent window dressing propped up by US force. These "victories" then get described as both military and political. The propaganda pieces all start off with glowing reports uncritically misattributing the military "success" to the Maliki forces, barely mentioning the massive US support without which they would never happen in the first place.

Then they go on to cite all sorts of intangible and conveniently unmeasurable rhetorical signs which they hope pass for political success. "Signs that Iraqis are standing up"; "vindications"; "signs that Iraqis are more confident"; and so on. So much mushy rhetorical slop that if you weren't reading critically or had suffered some brain damage they might cause one to believe there was some actual political successes. Yet the real political benchmarks rarely get mentioned; most notably because they continue to indicate no real and tangible political progress, and hence as the military quagmire continues their continuing collective absence add up to an overall picture of political failure regardless of any and all neo-con cheerleading.

-Mo

ps. If you want to waste your time reading the troll's neo-con cut'n'paste, see the first message in this thread, or just read the Wall Street Journal. For the sufficiently critical reader it falls on its own merits as I've described above. For a dose of relevant political observations (who is still boycotting the government, whether the negotiated cease-fires are actually observed, etc.) I offer the following:

Time/CNN
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1739726,00.html
Tuesday, May. 13, 2008 By MARK KUKIS/BAGHDAD
Maliki's Imperfect Makeover

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki was at pains to stress his new non-sectarian attitude when addressing Iraqi parliamentarians Monday. "The events of the past weeks have proven that we are neutral, not biased, that we did not take the side of this party or this sect against another," said Maliki, whose government has waged a two-month crackdown on the militia of onetime ally Moqtada al-Sadr. "We have also proven there is no security for any sect unless other sects can be guaranteed their security."

The remarks appeared to be yet another appeal by Maliki to convince Sunni factions who've boycotted his government for nearly a year to rejoin. Foundering negotiations between his government and the main Sunni bloc, the National Accordance Front, have gone on for months with no visible signs of progress, much to the frustration of Iraqi and American officials who'd like to shore up support for the Prime Minister.

The National Accordance Front has long accused Maliki, a Shi'ite, of being too much of a sectarian partisan to offer evenhanded leadership in a coalition government comprising Sunnis, Shi'ites and Kurds. That was a fair criticism until November 2006, when the Sadrists, too, began a boycott of Mailiki's government because the Prime Minister refused to press for an American withdrawal. Tensions between the two formerly allied Shi'ite factions built until open clashes erupted in Basra in March, when Iraqi forces attacked Mahdi Army havens there. The move sparked months of fighting that spread across southern Iraq and Baghdad — and offered Maliki a chance to prove his political critics wrong.

But the gesture seems to have fallen flat. The National Accordance Front still appears uninterested in getting involved in a Maliki government. No doubt part of that calculation has much to do with lingering disputes between the two camps, such as over the fate of thousands of Sunni detainees in Iraqi jails the National Accordance Front wants freed. But a new reality is emerging that may factor into the thinking of potential political allies the Prime Minister is courting: Maliki is looking more and more like a lame duck as October elections in Iraq approach.

What little political capital Maliki's hobbled and isolated government holds is likely to dwindle in the upcoming provincial elections, which both the Sadrists and the Sunni factions hope to capitalize on. By and large both camps stayed away from the last elections in 2005. But since then both the Sadrists and various Sunni factions have displayed a new interest in gathering political power at the polls even while keeping a hand in Iraq's ongoing violence. The Sadrists are poised to win broadly in southern Iraq, while members of the Sunni Awakening Council will likely clinch victories in Anbar Province. That will leave Maliki, with a cabinet without Sadrists and Sunnis, struggling to make the case for having a national mandate.

Already he suffers in the shadow of Iraq's most popular nationalist, Moqtada al-Sadr. Fighting between U.S.-backed Iraqi forces and guerrilla fighters in Sadr City flared again Monday despite the announcement over the weekend of a cease-fire. On the afternoon Maliki spoke, sporadic clashes in Sadr City left at least 11 dead and 19 wounded — and opened the question of whether the Prime Minister has the ability to make peace at all anymore.



« Last Edit: 2008-05-14 15:44:06 by MoEnzyme » Report to moderator   Logged

I will fight your gods for food,
Mo Enzyme


(consolidation of handles: Jake Sapiens; memelab; logicnazi; Loki; Every1Hz; and Shadow)
Salamantis
Neophyte
*****

Posts: 2845
Reputation: 0.00



I'm a llama!

View Profile E-Mail
Re:Maliki's Victory
« Reply #2 on: 2008-06-01 02:25:56 »
Reply with quote

[[ author reputation (0.00) beneath threshold (3)... display message ]]

Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1] Reply Notify of replies Send the topic Print 
Jump to:


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Church of Virus BBS | Powered by YaBB SE
© 2001-2002, YaBB SE Dev Team. All Rights Reserved.

Please support the CoV.
Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS! RSS feed