Author
|
Topic: virus: More than two choices in a poll (Read 1023 times) |
|
simul
Adept
Gender:
Posts: 614 Reputation: 7.53 Rate simul
I am a lama.
|
|
virus: More than two choices in a poll
« on: 2003-10-15 10:17:28 » |
|
If there are more than two choices in any poll or vote, unless it is a question like "how old are you"... there should always be checkboxes instead of radiobuttons. We should endeavor to err in favor of choice.
http://www.electionmethods.org --- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
|
First, read Bruce Sterling's "Distraction", and then read http://electionmethods.org.
|
|
|
David Lucifer
Archon
Posts: 2642 Reputation: 8.75 Rate David Lucifer
Enlighten me.
|
|
Re:virus: More than two choices in a poll
« Reply #1 on: 2003-10-15 11:51:14 » |
|
[simul] If there are more than two choices in any poll or vote, unless it is a question like "how old are you"... there should always be checkboxes instead of radiobuttons.
[Lucifer] That only makes sense when the options are not mutually exclusive. Many votes have more than 2 choices and all are mutually exclusive such as this one>> http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=8;action=voteResults;idvote=3
|
|
|
|
simul
Adept
Gender:
Posts: 614 Reputation: 7.53 Rate simul
I am a lama.
|
|
Re: virus: More than two choices in a poll
« Reply #2 on: 2003-10-15 19:28:29 » |
|
Possibly, for that poll, since its intention does not seem to be to determine a virian consensus.
However, just because there is a single winner in results does not mean there must be a single choice in votes.
For example: an existing poll for the number of ratings grades has a list of choices 3,5,7,9,11 etc. Only one can be chosen.
However, I should be able to express my preference for 3 OR 5 as acceptable choices. There is only one, exclusive outcome, but that is no reason to restrict the expression of preference.
The purpose of a poll is to find a consensus single winner - not to determine the single choice within a given vector. I may feel that 3 or 5 is fine. (In fact that is exactly how I feel).
What is the purpose of restricting choices? Does it help, in any way, determine consensus?
For more info, please read: http://www.electionmethods.org
The technique is known as "approval voting" and it is proven to find more pareto and condorcet results than plurality. It is powerful consensus technology, and will result in a more powerful religion over time.
-----Original Message----- From: "David Lucifer" <david@lucifer.com> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:51:15 To:virus@lucifer.com Subject: Re:virus: More than two choices in a poll
[simul] If there are more than two choices in any poll or vote, unless it is a question like "how old are you"... there should always be checkboxes instead of radiobuttons.
[Lucifer] That only makes sense when the options are not mutually exclusive. Many votes have more than 2 choices and all are mutually exclusive such as this one>> http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=8;action=voteResults;idvote=3
---- This message was posted by David Lucifer to the Virus 2003 board on Church of Virus BBS. <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=54;action=display;threadid=29526> --- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l> --- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
|
First, read Bruce Sterling's "Distraction", and then read http://electionmethods.org.
|
|
|
Kalkor
Magister
Gender:
Posts: 109 Reputation: 6.78 Rate Kalkor
Kneading the swollen donkey...
|
|
RE: virus: More than two choices in a poll
« Reply #3 on: 2003-10-15 20:46:07 » |
|
[Erik] However, I should be able to express my preference for 3 OR 5 as acceptable choices. There is only one, exclusive outcome, but that is no reason to restrict the expression of preference.
The purpose of a poll is to find a consensus single winner - not to determine the single choice within a given vector. I may feel that 3 or 5 is fine. (In fact that is exactly how I feel).
[Kalkor] The purpose of a poll is to gather data about opinions, not find a consensus single winner. The wording of this poll, by implication since you can only chose one, is something along the lines of "if you had to chose ONE of these, which would it be?" not "which of these do you prefer? chose as many as you'd like."
Kalkor
--- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
|
|
|
|
simul
Adept
Gender:
Posts: 614 Reputation: 7.53 Rate simul
I am a lama.
|
|
Re: virus: More than two choices in a poll
« Reply #4 on: 2003-10-15 23:29:19 » |
|
So the purpose of the poll is not to determine the best course of action? Hmm. Then what's the real point?
-----Original Message----- From: "Kalkor" <kalkor@kalkor.com> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 17:46:07 To:<virus@lucifer.com> Subject: RE: virus: More than two choices in a poll
[Erik] However, I should be able to express my preference for 3 OR 5 as acceptable choices. There is only one, exclusive outcome, but that is no reason to restrict the expression of preference.
The purpose of a poll is to find a consensus single winner - not to determine the single choice within a given vector. I may feel that 3 or 5 is fine. (In fact that is exactly how I feel).
[Kalkor] The purpose of a poll is to gather data about opinions, not find a consensus single winner. The wording of this poll, by implication since you can only chose one, is something along the lines of "if you had to chose ONE of these, which would it be?" not "which of these do you prefer? chose as many as you'd like."
Kalkor
--- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l> --- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
|
First, read Bruce Sterling's "Distraction", and then read http://electionmethods.org.
|
|
|
|
Kalkor
Magister
Gender:
Posts: 109 Reputation: 6.78 Rate Kalkor
Kneading the swollen donkey...
|
|
RE: virus: More than two choices in a poll
« Reply #6 on: 2003-10-16 17:53:50 » |
|
[Erik] However, I should be able to express my preference for 3 OR 5 as acceptable choices. There is only one, exclusive outcome, but that is no reason to restrict the expression of preference.
The purpose of a poll is to find a consensus single winner - not to determine the single choice within a given vector. I may feel that 3 or 5 is fine. (In fact that is exactly how I feel).
[Kalkor] The purpose of a poll is to gather data about opinions, not find a consensus single winner. The wording of this poll, by implication since you can only chose one, is something along the lines of "if you had to chose ONE of these, which would it be?" not "which of these do you prefer? chose as many as you'd like."
[Erik2] So the purpose of the poll is not to determine the best course of action? Hmm. Then what's the real point?
[Kalkor2] Now we're gonna have to get into a semantic argument. Shall we?
'the purpose of a poll' 'the purpose of the poll' 'the purpose of this poll'
Please discuss, class ;-}
Kalkor
--- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
|
|
|
|
|