From: Blunderov (squooker@mweb.co.za)
Date: Thu May 27 2004 - 04:44:09 MDT
Sean Kenny
Sent: 27 May 2004 08:41 AM
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 02:00, Joe Dees wrote:
> (Joe) Some examples of Irvken's subtle and scintillating commentary
concerning me and my posts, from the most recent back, follow:
Yes Joe, these are personal attacks, and meant, you fucking quisling.
There are no soldiers on your streets shooting dead your kids. Moderate
away, I probably don't have the time to argue with a shit like you (and
your corporate sponsors) anyway, but I can keep up the insults till I'm
banned :)
[Blunderov] A wise man once remarked that insult is never given; only
taken. Joe would be perfectly justified in ignoring your ad hominem
completely. But he is under no obligation to do so.
Please consider whether you really wish to be banned. You are under no
compulsion to read, or reply to Joe's posts if you don't wish to.
I can perfectly understand that emotion can overcome reason from time to
time. These are very testing times. But there is little point in being
deliberately and persistently objectionable. It is unreasonable.
I can't imagine how it would give you satisfaction to prove that Joe
understands this better than you do.
Best Regards.
--- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 27 2004 - 04:45:19 MDT