From: Blunderov (squooker@mweb.co.za)
Date: Sat May 22 2004 - 15:40:57 MDT
Erik Aronesty
Sent: 22 May 2004 10:12 PM
Perhaps the camera was there so the images could be leaked?
The intention being that we would incite a major Jihad.
I recall a theory that Bush & Co. are messianic lunatics trying to bring
about a Christian apocalypse. The best way to do that is to create a
political situation that justifies a nuclear attack (fire from god).
Self-fulfilling prophecy rears its hideous, misshapen head.
--- [Blunderov] Much as I would like to say that it's impossible, who knows? Maybe. Getting back to the photographs; I see that an officer has resigned rather than faces charges of photographing his female colleagues in the showers at Abu Ghraib. http://news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,9630291%255E1702,00.html They really do seem to have had a thing for amateur photography in that place. And plenty of cameras with which to indulge their creative impulses too. Do armies really allow all their troops to take unofficial cameras into battlezones? Think of the intelligence implications. What sort of general would allow that to happen? Best Regards --- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 22 2004 - 15:41:57 MDT