From: Joe Dees (hidden@lucifer.com)
Date: Wed May 19 2004 - 17:12:36 MDT
Joe Dees
Sent: 19 May 2004 09:39 PM
The author, citing evidence, depicts Massey as an emotionally unstable
opportunist and his interviewer as an elaborating anti-Bush partisan both of
which call into serious question the original article's credibility.
---- [Blunderov] Shooting the messenger. Which bit isn't true? Best Regards No, showing the messenger to be a liar; a likely liar about the DU episodes (which were never a concern of Massey's in his previous interviews, but were previous concerns of Paul Rockwell), and a certain liar about the candy and gunfire scenario, clearly lifted off a Muslim hate site. These lies being exposed, and the biases of both the interviewer and the interviewee being clear, the rest of the contentions then come under serious question. But, of course, none of this is clear to you. Since their biases are equivalent to yours, they are invisible to you, as also, apparently, was the exposing of lies which you dearly desire to be prejudice-confirming truths. ---- This message was posted by Joe Dees to the Virus 2004 board on Church of Virus BBS. <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=61;action=display;threadid=30322> --- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 19 2004 - 17:13:16 MDT