RE: virus: Coming Soon: Companies Copyrighting Facts

From: Blunderov (squooker@mweb.co.za)
Date: Tue Mar 16 2004 - 14:50:35 MST

  • Next message: Erik Aronesty: "Re: virus: Coming Soon: Companies Copyrighting Facts"

    [Blunderov]I have also heard that there were moves afoot by someone to
    patent the human genome.

    It seems that increasingly, the flow information in many spheres is
    being restricted, whether for commercial or security reasons.

    Here in SA you now have to pay an annual fee to belong to a library. It
    is quite a small amount of money but it nevertheless must be a deterrent
    to very many who simply have no money to spare at all. The libraries
    have been forced to take this step because they are so badly funded.

    This does not bode well for the internet. Here in SA there is much
    unhappiness about some draft legislation that, so far, has it in mind to
    force anyone who has a website to obtain a licence.

    Hopefully this will not come to pass. There seems to be a strong lobby
    which is representing the argument that this legislation will tend to
    muffle the IT industry and cost the country jobs and skills.

    I hope they prevail.

    Best Regards

    http://atheism.about.com/b/a/069999.htm?terms=n610b
    March 09, 2004
    Coming Soon: Companies Copyrighting Facts
    The standard concept of copyright in America is that you cannot
    copyright facts. You can copyright the way facts are presented, but not
    the facts themselves. Thus, a recipe for a cake cannot be copyrighted,
    but the way the recipe is presented and the way the instructions are
    expressed can. Some people wish to change this now and have a law passed
    that would allow them to exercise copyrights over facts - a move that
    would be devastating to intellectual freedom and progress.
    Kim Zetter writes for Wired about the Database and Collections of
    Information Misappropriation Act which is moving through Congress:

    Ostensibly, the Database and Collections of Information Misappropriation
    Act (HR3261) makes it a crime for anyone to copy and redistribute a
    substantial portion of data collected by commercial database companies
    and list publishers. But critics say the bill would give the companies
    ownership of facts -- stock quotes, historical health data, sports
    scores and voter lists. The bill would restrict the kinds of free
    exchange and shared resources that are essential to an informed
    citizenry, opponents say.
    Art Brodsky, spokesman for public advocacy group Public Knowledge, says
    the bill would let anyone drop a fact into a database or a collection of
    materials and claim monopoly rights to it. ... Under the terms of the
    broadly written bill, a public-health website could be deemed in
    violation of the law for gathering a list of the latest health headlines
    and providing links to them on its home page. Google would be in
    violation for trolling media databases and providing stories on its news
    page.
    An encyclopedia site not only could own the historical facts contained
    in its online entries, but could do so long after the copyright on
    authorship of the written entries had expired. Unlike copyright, which
    expires 70 years after the death of a work's author, the
    Misappropriation Act doesn't designate an expiration date. "The law of
    unintended consequences in this case has the potential to be huge,"
    Brodsky said.
    If a bill like this passes, a lot of the information that is distributed
    in society could be locked down by "owners" who insist that they be
    allowed to control how that information is distributed. If they don't
    want certain people to have access to information, they could deny it to
    them - owners of legal databases, for example, could deny access to
    liberal or conservative groups, depending upon the owners' political
    stance. And, if they are willing to permit someone access, it would be
    in exchange for a hefty fee along with a promise not to pass the
    material along to anyone else.

    When facts and information can be controlled by a few - by the rich and
    powerful - democracy itself is threatened in a fundamental way. The
    government wouldn't be permitted to do this and neither should larger
    corporations.

    ---
    To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 16 2004 - 14:52:02 MST