From: Eva-Lise Carlstrom (evalise@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Feb 27 2004 - 11:07:03 MST
Thanks for finding better documentation and context.
My post was an attempt to improve on a completely
unattributed version posted earlier.
--Eva
--- Jonathan Davis <jonathan.davis@lineone.net> wrote:
> Hi Eva,
>
> That Observer story was badly flawed. The report was
> not a report by the
> Pentagon but a report for the Pentagon - a
> deliberate what if scenario for
> their planners to use in the unlikely event those
> circumstances came about.
>
> This link has the background...
>
> http://timblair.spleenville.com/archives/006051.php
>
> This looks like one where zeal overcame integrity at
> the Guardian/Observer.
>
> Regards
>
> Limbic
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-virus@lucifer.com
> [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com] On Behalf Of
> Eva-Lise Carlstrom
> Sent: 27 February 2004 08:30
> To: virus@lucifer.com
> Subject: virus: Pentagon predictions
>
> Here's another link, with attribution, about the
> dire climate etc.
> predictions leaked from the Pentagon that someone
> posted earlier.
>
>
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20040222/sc_afp/britain_uzone
> s_environment_040222221313
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
--- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Feb 27 2004 - 11:09:18 MST