Re: virus: Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest

From: Dr Sebby (drsebby@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Feb 02 2004 - 14:16:06 MST

  • Next message: Erik Aronesty: "Re: virus: Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest"

    ...even if 200,000 yrs is the number, how would that give time for australia
    to drift away from southeast asia? could it be that semi-men trecked off
    earlier? neanderthals? what accounts for the australoids?

    DrSebby.
    "Courage...and shuffle the cards".

    ----Original Message Follows----
    From: "Erik Aronesty" <erik@zoneedit.com>
    Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com
    To: virus@lucifer.com
    Subject: Re: virus: Drowned Indian city could be world's oldest
    Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:23:16 -0400

    Most theories have AFrica as the birthplace of humanity. The only thing
    people argue about these days is whether it was 200,000 years or 60,000
    years ago.

    I always figured that the sort of people who left the land of free food and
    warm weather would be social outcasts.

    Which would explain why white people can't dance.

    Heh. 

    ---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to 
<http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 02 2004 - 14:18:41 MST