Next message: Jonathan Davis: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Previous message: Jonathan Davis: "virus: Doug Rushkoff's new book available as PDF"
- In reply to: Jonathan Davis: "RE: virus: The Ideohazard 1.1"
- Next in thread: Jonathan Davis: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Jonathan Davis: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Reply: Blunderov: "RE: virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Hermit: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Kharin: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Kharin: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Jonathan Davis: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Kharin: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Jonathan Davis: "RE: virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Kharin: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Jonathan Davis: "RE: virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
[Kalkor]
Massive amounts of the thread snipped, to focus on one recurring point I
keep seeing. Since we're in the hobby of studying memetics, I thought we'd
study this one logical fallacy a bit as it doesn't seem to get much
attention but is USED a lot in, for instance, advertising. Ad Populem.
Below I have quoted Hermit during this exchange. I would like to state that
the quotes were chosen by scanning through quickly until I found some
keywords. The object of this post is not to attack anyone, but to discuss
the finer points of peer review versus the Ad Populem fallacy.
The Ad Populem fallacy states that it is fallacious in argument to say
something like "everyone else agrees with him so you should too". So what
about saying something like "accepted approvingly only by people infested
with a similar political ideology. His work is not regarded as exceptional
by any significant academic group and his character is viewed as flawed."
Is this, too, an example of the Ad Populem fallacy? Does Ad Populem
necessarily have to do with claiming the support of the crowd? How about
claiming the disdain of the crowd?
[Hermit 6] A slew of fallacies, from ad populam (claiming support of the
crowd) to ad hominem.
[Hermit 4] It is not at all irrelevant. Neither was it poisoning the well.
The man takes short cuts in all directions and uses his spurious "authority"
to make a never ending stream of assertions accepted approvingly only by
people infested with a similar political ideology. His work is not regarded
as exceptional by any significant academic group and his character is viewed
as flawed. The mention of his history suffices to prove that this is neither
a stretch nor a new phenomenon. In science at least, but in academia
generally in my experience, reputation is jealously guarded, because you
have only one. Scruton has one, but it smells a bit like last week's hake.
---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
- Next message: Jonathan Davis: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Previous message: Jonathan Davis: "virus: Doug Rushkoff's new book available as PDF"
- In reply to: Jonathan Davis: "RE: virus: The Ideohazard 1.1"
- Next in thread: Jonathan Davis: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Jonathan Davis: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Reply: Blunderov: "RE: virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Hermit: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Kharin: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Kharin: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Jonathan Davis: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Kharin: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Jonathan Davis: "RE: virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Kharin: "Re:virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Maybe reply: Jonathan Davis: "RE: virus: Studying Ad Populem, was: ideohazard 1.1"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Mon Sep 29 2003 - 10:50:33 MDT