From: Jake Sapiens (every1hz@earthlink.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 2003 - 17:44:23 MDT
I think that if we are creating doctrine etc, that a more deliberative
process is better. Something wherein people take more direct
responsibility for their decisions by at least revealing votes to each
other and thereby discussing them more. This Reputation/voting system
isn't what I had in mind when I envisioned a Virian Council. But that is
in fact the way that Hermit is currently using the system. I think it is
far too open to unreflective caprice. I had no problem with you as sheriff
using it for feedback in trying to make an executive decision, but it seems
now that Hermit has taken this as the green light to start laying down
Virian doctrine. Did I miss a memo from you somewhere along the line?
Love,
-Jake
> [Original Message]
> From: David McFadzean <david@lucifer.com>
> To: <virus@lucifer.com>
> Date: 08/29/2003 3:47:55 PM
> Subject: Re: virus: Is this really how we want to govern ourselves?
>
> What do you suggest?
>
> David
>
> p.s. One good rule for creating voting issues might be to avoid biasing
the outcome by the phrasing
> of the question.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jake Sapiens
> To: virus
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:21 PM
> Subject: virus: Is this really how we want to govern ourselves?
>
>
> [Jake] While I find this interesting feedback, it really strikes me as
rule by incestuous polling.
> Have we mistaken a useful feedback mechanism for an appropriate control
mechanism? Important issues
> of Virian Doctrine deserve better consideration.
>
> ---
> To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to
<http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
--- Jake Sapiens
--- every1hz@earthlink.net
--- EarthLink: The #1 provider of the Real Internet.
--- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Aug 30 2003 - 15:32:53 MDT