Re: virus: Disowning Dees

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Tue Aug 19 2003 - 02:24:03 MDT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: virus: Disowning Dees"

    Date sent: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 01:56:33 -0600
    To: virus@lucifer.com
    Subject: virus: Disowning Dees
    From: "Hermit" <hidden@lucifer.com>
    Send reply to: virus@lucifer.com

    >
    > Call for the Disownment of Joe Dees with Immediate Effect
    >
    > This letter should be read in conjunction with [ Hermit,
    > "Disownment", 2003-08-19 ]
    > (http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=54;action=display;thread
    > id=29095)
    >
    > Jurisdiction
    >
    > Dees claims to be a member of the CoV. Thus the CoV has Jurisdiction
    > to determine his standing and the right to evaluate his actions.
    >
    > Accusation
    >
    > If we examine Dees' behaviour over the last three years, he appears
    > guilty of creating massive unhappiness and discord within the
    > membership and of harming the reputation of the CoV. In the former
    > through his conduct and actions making our forums unpleasant and
    > unuseable by other members, in the latter in coninuously advocating
    > the anti Islamic, neoconservative "Dees' America First and Only"
    > belief system in such volumes and aggression as to preclude any
    > effective response. A system which is rejected as bigoted by the vast
    > majority of our membership and potential membership, yet which is now
    > by default the "face" of the CoV.
    >
    > Action to Date
    >
    > Joe Dees has been remonstrated with, appealed to, disciplined and the
    > saga continues. We have offered a "soft schism" and this was not
    > acceptable.
    >
    > Call for Immediate Action
    >
    > At this point, the only fair response to the hypocritical vote to
    > censure Jake Sapiens (a valued member no matter how much snotty nosed
    > newcomers may deny attempt to deny it) while ignoring the egregarious
    > and ongoing malevolence of Joe Dees, without even offering the
    > possibility of an abstainment*, has resulted in forcing the membership
    > into the hypocritical action of nullification*.
    >
    > How much more damage are we to tolerate? David Lucifer, I suggest that
    > at this point either the CoV will take action to Disown Dees, or a
    > "hard schism" will inevitably follow.
    >
    > Recommended Process
    >
    > A Vote To Disownment: A vote is established calling for the Immediate
    > Disownment of Joe Dees.
    >
    > A Vote to Shun: A second vote calling for the purging of selected or
    > all material posted by Joe Dees to our various public forums to be
    > held contemporaneously.
    >
    > Franchise: All members of the CoV who have become, or register to
    > become, members of the Rating system.
    >
    > Duration: This Vote to close 36 hours after establishment.
    >
    > Adjudication: The vote to be carried in the event of a 60% majority
    > for the immediate disownment of Joe Dees.
    >
    > Closure: Discussion of the results - whether positive or negative - to
    > be declared off-topic forevermore after the vote is closed under pain
    > of suspension per the standing rules.
    >
    > Hermit
    >
    > *Nullification occurs when reasonable people people decide that the
    > law or the court is grossly unfair or inappropriate and thus refuse to
    > convict irrespective of evidence or argument.
    >
    > *Abstention occurs when people refuse to vote on the grounds that the
    > vote is rigged or inappropriate.
    >
    > ----
    > This message was posted by Hermit to the Virus 2003 board on Church of
    > Virus BBS.
    > <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=54;action=display;thread
    > id=29096> --- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to
    > <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

    ---
    To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 19 2003 - 02:22:55 MDT