From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sun Sep 15 2002 - 14:40:37 MDT
Powell takes Iraq case to the world 
NEW YORK (APOnline) ” Secretary of State Colin Powell 
gained diplomatic support for the strong U.S. stand against 
Saddam Hussein, winning approval Friday from all members of 
the U.N. Security Council for President Bush's assertion that the 
Iraqi leader poses a threat to international security. 
Still, Bush said he doubts Saddam would give up his weapons 
even in the face of U.N. demands or the U.S. threat of military 
force. And Powell did not seek the support of the 14 other 
Security Council members for the use of force. 
"The conversation never got quite that far directly," he told The 
Associated Press. "Everybody is hoping that a solution can be 
found." 
But, Powell said, "They clearly see the U.S. is not just talking 
about another resolution being ignored. I think they see the 
seriousness and the gravity of the situation." 
Powell's diplomacy was only the beginning of what could be an 
extended process of drafting a resolution that would demand ” 
again ” that Iraq open its weapons sites for inspection and 
destroy any weapons found. 
"I think all the members of the council are now seized with the 
issue, recognize the challenge that Iraq does present to 
international law and to the mandate of the Security Council," 
Powell said after a series of meetings in which he pressed Bush's 
demand for Iraqi disarmament. 
But the secretary gave no indication that he received endorsement 
for using force against Baghdad, as Bush has suggested may be 
necessary. And Chinese Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan said in a 
speech to the General Assembly that his government sought a 
political settlement, thereby hinting that it would not endorse 
force. 
"Efforts should be made to prevent the arbitrary enlargement of 
the scope of a counterterrorism campaign," he said. 
As a permanent Security Council member, China could kill any 
resolution with a veto. 
And Powell said that while Arab nations that make up the Gulf 
Cooperation Council offered "understanding and support," they 
reminded him that the Arab League is opposed to a conflict in the 
region. 
By next week, Powell said, the ministers will have had a chance to 
consult with their capitals. He stressed that he had not taken up 
the wording of a resolution. And as he took questions at the 
delegates' entrance to U.N. Secretariat, Powell said that Arab 
ministers probably would be in touch with Saddam. 
Earlier, foreign ministers of the U.N. Security Council's 
permanent five nations said that Iraq's refusal to obey past U.N. 
resolutions "is a serious matter and that Iraq must comply." 
The U.N. resolution would set a deadline for the return of 
weapons inspectors to Iraq and warn of serious consequences if 
Saddam continued to reject such an arrangement. 
"We're talking days and weeks, not months and years," Bush said. 
"I am highly doubtful that he will meet our demands. I hope he 
does but I'm highly doubtful," Bush said as he wound up talks 
with foreign leaders. 
Bush also wants congressional backing for possible military 
action against Iraq and he spoke mockingly of Democrats who 
have been holding back. 
"Democrats waiting for the U.N. to act?" Bush asked with 
chuckle. "I can't imagine an elected ... member of the United 
States Senate or House of Representatives saying, 'I think I'm 
going to wait for the United Nations to make a decision.' " 
Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov, in the midst of 
consultations with Powell, said of Saddam: "If he refuses to 
cooperate with the U.N. Security Council, the Iraqi government 
will take responsibility itself for possible consequences." 
Besides Russia and the United States, the other three permanent 
members are Britain, France and China. 
While the Russian support could be a boost for Bush, the 
president was still struggling to draw support from Congress. 
Democratic leaders said the administration must provide more 
information on threats posed by Saddam and on U.S. plans for 
removing the Iraqi president before Congress considers a 
resolution in support of military action. 
"This is very serious business. Let's slow it down a bit," Sen. 
Joseph Biden, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, said 
Friday. 
Senate Majority Leader Thomas Daschle, a South Dakota 
Democrat, has said he hasn't yet seen enough evidence to justify 
going to war against Saddam. 
Still, on Capitol Hill, there was some good news for the 
administration. 
Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman, D-Conn., said he would work with 
members of both parties to try to draw up a congressional 
resolution. The aim, he said, is "the broadest possible bipartisan 
support for the president, as commander in chief, as he works to 
protect our nation and the world from Saddam Hussein." 
Congress is preparing to hold at least five hearings on the 
confrontation with Iraq. 
Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz dismissed Bush's speech, 
and in turn his remarks were dismissed by White House 
spokesman Ari Fleischer. "Obviously, they have something to 
hide," he said of the Iraqis. 
Cheney, appearing on the Rush Limbaugh radio program, rejected 
any idea that the administration's Iraq policy was geared to 
elections in November. 
"Every other year is an election year and you can't take half the 
calendar and put it off-limits. This is an issue the president and I 
have talked about now for months," he said. 
Cheney said the administration expects to provide Congress with 
more evidence to back up its allegations about Saddam. 
And Gen. Richard Myers, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of 
Staff, said in Washington that the United States has evidence Iraq 
has made mobile laboratories to make chemical or biological 
weapons.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:58 MDT