From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Fri Aug 16 2002 - 23:34:03 MDT
If Iraq attacks Israel with non-conventional weapons, causing 
massive casualties among the civilian population, Israel could 
respond with a nuclear retaliation that would eradicate Iraq as a 
country. This assessment, from American intelligence, was 
presented last week to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations 
Committee, Haaretz reported Thursday. 
The U.S. intelligence assessments include an analysis of possible 
Israeli responses. The lowest probability is that Israel would 
respond initially with a conventional military retaliation if it is 
slightly harmed, and would add a warning that a non-conventional 
response was possible if the Iraqi attacks on the Israeli civilian 
population continued. 
According to the newspaper, the possibility of Israel using nuclear 
weapons against Iraq appears in a document submitted by military 
expert Dr. Anthony Cordesman, a fellow at the Center for 
Strategic and International Studies, to the Senate Foreign 
Relations Committee. 
In the worst case scenario, writes Cordesman, Israel could face an 
existential threat to important urban areas such as Tel Aviv or 
Haifa. Under such conditions, it would threaten nuclear retaliation 
against Iraqi cities and military forces to cease the Iraqi attack. 
Meanwhile, it is reported that the US government has offered 
nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) millions of dollars to 
establish humanitarian relief projects in Iraq and neighboring 
areas ahead of military action against Saddam Hussein™s regime. 
In a front page article, the London-based newspaper the Financial 
Times (FT) said the US state department had called on NGOs to 
bid for US$6.6 million of government funds to pay for at least five 
US humanitarian projects. It would constitute the first time that 
the United States has funded relief work in Iraq since United 
Nations embargo was imposed on the country 12 years ago, the FT 
quoted a US official as saying. 
Once the projects -- including facilities for medical care, shelter, 
water and relief supplies for refugees -- were in place, 
international aid workers would be evacuated from the region 
ahead of any military action, and replaced by local staff. 
"I find it strange that at this particular moment, the US 
government is announcing an open competition for proposals for 
humanitarian assistance projects in Iraq, specifying that it can be 
in any part of the country," said Joel Charny, vice president for 
policy at Washington-based Refugees International. "It seems in 
contradiction to the policy of embargo and limiting assistance to 
areas controlled by (Iraqi President) Saddam Hussein," Charny 
added, according to the FT. (Albawaba.com) 
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:54 MDT