From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Thu Jul 25 2002 - 02:56:04 MDT
On 25 Jul 2002 at 9:42, Walpurgis wrote:
>
> > [rhinoceros 3]
> > My point here was that, while metamodernists are accused of ethical
> > relativism (implying immorality), ethical relativism is omnipresent.
>
> It could be argued that positing an absolute morality is immoral
> because of its coercive implications ("what I say is right and if you
> disagree you are evil - and should be
> punished/sanctioned/ignored"). Absolutist systems are employed by
> tyrants and monotheistic religions. At least relativists enjoy debate.
>
I do not wish to debate whether or not the rape and murder of a five-
year old is wrong; I wish to incarcerate the perpetrator, and I worry
about those who consider it a debatable issue.
>
> Walpurgis
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://www.noumenal.net/exiles
>
> Under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, the government police
> and other authorities can, with out a court order, demand that phone
> companies, internet service providers and postal operators hand over
> detailed information on individuals such as their name and address, phone
> calls made and received, source and destination of emails, the identity of
> websites visited and mobile phone location data, which is capable of
> revealing the user's whereabouts at any given time and is accurate to
> within a few hundred metres.
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/humanrights/story/0,7369,731074,00.html
>
> http://www.faxyourMP.com
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:49 MDT