From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sat Jul 13 2002 - 01:19:50 MDT
Go to:
http://www.secularislam.org/jihad/exeges
is.htm
or read below.
An exegesis on ˜Jihad in Islam™ 
Syed Kamran Mirza
Sye_mirza@hotmail.com 
[Author™s note: I apologize to the readers for writing such a 
lengthy essay on Jihad. Jihad is extremely serious matter in the 
Islamic history. There is abundance of valuable literatures 
depicting Islamic Jihad which I could not include in order to keep 
the size within limit. However, I tried my best to make it as 
plausible as possible by many important literatures dealing with 
Jihad. Some Islamists are trying to fool the western readers by 
their deceitful and elusive meanings of Jihad. I urge the readers to 
have patience to read the entire article in order to learn about the 
true meaning of Islamic Jihad.] 
September Eleventh™s horrific episode has come as the big 
thunder out of the blue to strike the core meaning of Islam. Since 
then, Islamists were busy defending Islam, which according to 
them was hijacked by militant Islamists. For quite a while, they 
spent time in their futile efforts to make Islam a peaceful religion. 
Now they are busy again to give a wishful new meaning of Jihad. 
This essay will be dedicated to explore the practical meaning and 
purpose of Islamic Jihad. 
What is the meaning of Jihad? 
The meaning of Jihad in the Webster Dictionary: is Holy war. The 
meaning of œCrusade is also Holy war. Entire humanity 
knows”historically both œJihad and œCrusade was soaked with 
blood. Now why then we are debating and trying to redefine Jihad 
at this juncture?
Now in the Arabic language the word œJihad literally means, "to 
strive, and "to struggle. Some Muslim scholars further classify 
Jihad into following categories: 1. Jihad-an-nafs or Jihad against 
one™s self; 2. Jihad ash-shaitaan or Jihad against Satan; 3. Jihad 
al-kuffar or Jihad against disbeliever; 4. Jihad al-munafiqeen or 
Jihad against hypocrites; 5. Jihad al-faasiqeen or Jihad against 
corrupt Muslims. Now, can we make people fool by these 
semantic loopholes of the various meanings of Jihad? Certainly 
not! 
Honestly, I am not very much impressed by the various bookish 
meanings of the Arabic word œJihad. We know very well that in 
every language certain words may have many different meanings 
depending on its usage. That does not mean one can elude people 
the actual meaning of the word with some different meanings of a 
particular word. Because the word meaning is always understood 
by its practical or circumstantial use only. Consider the word 
Jihad that means struggle. This struggle may have various 
circumstantial effects. Struggle can be in your mind, in your own 
life, in your work, in your way to office with the traffic, or 
struggle may be fighting with the enemy. You can say: œI am 
fighting with my mind whether I should accept it or not, or œI am 
fighting with my wife over the decision of changing our house or 
you can say”œI am fighting a war with my enemy. Now, a 
simple human being will see the meaning of the word œfight 
(usual meaning of which is armed collision) varies greatly with 
it™s circumstantial use. 
Sometimes the actual meaning of a particular word may even 
change by the circumstantial use. Consider the Perso-Indian 
(Urdu) word œRazakar means œhelper of King. However, by its 
circumstantial and historical use, the meaning may have changed 
greatly. In 1971, Bangalee™s freedom struggle (War of Freedom or 
Muktijuddha) the Razakars killed, raped, and tortured millions of 
freedom loving Bangalees. Now, in Bangladesh, calling some 
body a Razakar is not salutary, but on the contrary it is an epithet 
or it is an outright demeaning, to put it mildly. If you call 
somebody Razakar, he may come to physically assault you. Why? 
The circumstantial and historical effects have changed the 
meaning and nuances of the word Razakar from helper to vile 
conspirator and Fifth Columnist. That is a valid reason why we 
must take the meaning of Jihad from its historical and 
circumstantial effects. I shall search for the meaning of the Jihad 
from its (a) History, (b) Qur™an referrals, (c) Hadiths™ mentioning 
of it, and (d) Historians and Islamic scholars interpretation of it. 
A. Historical meaning of Jihad: 
Historically, Jihad means Holly War. For 1400 years, Muslims 
always understood the meaning of Jihad as Islamic Holy War. 
Every Islamic scholar, Mullah, maulana, Imam, etc., of the whole 
world will agree with this meaning of Jihad. Technically, Jihad is 
war against non-Muslims (Jihad al-kuffar or Jihad against 
disbeliever; and Jihad al-munafiqeen or Jihad against hypocrites) 
only, since Muslims are forbidden to fight the Muslims. Hundreds 
of books were written by the Islamic scholars on Jihad and 
everybody unanimously used the word Jihad as the religious war 
called holy war. In the Islamic history, more than 80% of the texts 
are filled with Holy War (Jihad). Early Islam was spread in the 
Arabian Peninsula solely by holy wars (Jihad). Islam was 
propagated as a religion by series of wars/battles “both defensive 
as well as Offensive. As many as 78 historic battles were fought 
by the Prophet Muhammad himself. And out of 78, only one 
(battle of ditch) was defensive war, and the rest were simply 
offensive wars. Did Muslim soldiers go to Syria, Iran, and Egypt 
to fight defensive war? What about those great historical 
BATTLES “ Battle of Oho™d, Battle of Bad™r, Battle of Khayber, 
signing of peace-pacts such as œHudaibya Peace Pact, etc.? Were 
those wars fought with the so-called struggle only? Alternatively, 
were those wars fought with the heart-piercing sharpened swords? 
Prophet Mohammed and his successors initiated series of 
offensive wars against pagan Arabs, Jews, Christians, etc., to 
spread or to impose Islam by force as well as to seize the 
abundance (booty) of these lands. However, it was quite possible 
that there had been some small numbers of conversions by sheer 
greatness of Prophet himself or due to some other miracles. 
Nevertheless, a great majority was converted by force, and people 
of Arabia did not have freedom to choose. After Prophet 
Muhammad gained enough might in his force while in Medina, 
the tradition was to send an invitation of Islam to various Arab 
Tribes or countries. First, an invitation to pagans to accept Islam, 
then war against those who refuse to accept Islam. A typical 
invitation to the people of the book (Christians and Jews) was: 
œEmbrace Islam, or pay the poll-tax (Ziziya), or fight to death. 
Undoubtedly, the concept of an offensive war to spread the faith 
of Islam is a genuine Islamic concept: Holy War (Jihad) for the 
sake of God. I can write hundreds of pages of authentic Islamic 
history of wars in which tens of thousands of life was lost; tons of 
human bloods were shed. 
Prophet Muhammad was injured seriously (lost some teeth) in one 
of those wars he fought relentlessly. Prophet™s uncle Amir 
Hamzah was killed and dismembered and his liver and heart were 
eaten by the wife of a pagan tribe leader Abu Sufian. Now may I 
ask what kind of so-called œstruggle might have caused these 
above misery? It was obviously by Jihad (Holy War) and not by 
any peaceful struggle, indeed. 
B. What Qur™an Says about Jihad? 
Jihad was mentioned in the Qur™an most frequently with the 
meaning of "warfare, often coupled with "fi sabil Allah" (in the 
way of Allah). Jihad as warfare is a pivotal concern for the 
Qur™an, the Hadith and the Shari˜ah which we shall explore later 
in this essay.
All most all the hateful, coercive, intimidating and tempting 
verses in the Quran were made in respect to the Jihad”Holy war. 
Important to note: Prophet Muhammad while he was in Mecca did 
not have too many supporters; hence, he was very weak in power 
compare to the Pagans. It was at that time he brought some soft 
verses (maximum one dozen in the whole Qur™an) which our 
hypocritical Islamists use them to elude the truth of Islam. But in 
Medina Muhammad quickly assumed both religious and political 
power and leadership over the whole Median community. It was 
at that time he brought all those harsh/hateful (several hundreds of 
them) Qur™anic verses just to incite his followers to fight. 
In the Holy Qur™an one can find hundreds of verses (Ayats) which 
dictates to fight holy wars (Jihad) against non-Muslims infidels. 
Let me cite here a few of them: 
Qur™an-(9:5): œBut when the forbidden months are past, then fight 
and slay the pagans wherever ye find them, And seize them, 
beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of 
war) ; but if they repent (accept Islam) and establish regular 
prayers and practices regular charity then open the way for them; 
for God is oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. 
Qur™an-(8:65): œ O Apostle ! Rouse the believers to the fight, if 
there are twenty amongst you, patient and persevering , they will 
vanquish two hundred; if a hundred, they will vanquish a thousand 
of the unbelievers; for these are a people without understanding. 
Quran-2:216: Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But 
it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you 
Qur™an-(2:191): œAnd slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn 
them out from where they have turned you out¦¦¦such is the 
reward of those who suppress faith. 
Qur™an-(9:29): œFight those who believe not the Allah nor the last 
day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah 
and his apostle, nor acknowledge the religion of truth even if they 
are the people of the book, until they pay the Jizya with willing 
submission, and feel themselves subdued. 
Qur™an(48:20): œ¦.Allah promises you much booty (spoils of 
war) that you will capture from the defeated infidels¦. 
Quran-8:38 œAnd fight them on until there is no more Tumult or 
oppression 
Quran-8:12: I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: 
smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them 
Quran-8: 15,16: O ye who believe! when ye meet the Unbelievers 
in hostile array, never turn your backs to them. If any do turn his 
back to them on such a day - unless it be in a stratagem of war, or 
to retreat to a troop (of his own)- he draws on himself the wrath of 
Allah, and his abode is Hell,- an evil refuge (indeed)! 
Quran-9:111: Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons 
and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): 
they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding 
on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the 
Qur™anQuran-9:73: O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and 
the hypocrites! Be harsh with them. Their ultimate abode is hell, a 
hapless journey™s end. 
Quran-9:123: O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers 
who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know 
that Allah is with those who keep their duty (unto Him). 
Quran-4:95: O ye who believe! Shall I show you a commerce that 
will save you from a painful doom? You should believe in Allah 
and His messenger, and should strive for the cause of Allah with 
your wealth and your lives. That is better for you, if ye did but 
know. ... Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and 
fight with their goods and persons than those who sit (at home). 
C. Jihad as per Hadiths: 
Fighting for the Cause of Allah (Jihad) was sanctioned widely in 
sahi hadiths. Almost one-third of the fourth of nine volumes of 
Bukhari, Islam™s principal collector of Hadith, focused on jihad as 
physical war. There are thousands of sahi hadiths that simply talk 
about Jihad”the holy war in Islam. I cannot include them all in 
this short essay in order to keep to a minimum. I will only 
mention however some of them in this essay. The following are a 
few examples: 
Sahi Bukhari# 35, page-102: 
Prophet Muhammad (sa) narrated, œ He who is out at war Allah 
becomes the protector for him. Because, he only joins the fight 
when he put his solid belief upon Allah and his Apostle. Allah 
provides him wealth and much booty (Maal-e-goni-mat) with 
which he returns home. Or, place him in the paradise by making 
him a Shaheed (martyrdom). 
Sahi Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 52, Number 46:
Narrated Abu Huraira: I heard Allah's Apostle saying, "The 
example of a Mujahid in Allah's Cause-- and Allah knows better 
who really strives in His Cause----is like a person who fasts and 
prays continuously. Allah guarantees that He will admit the 
Mujahid in His Cause into Paradise if he is killed, otherwise He 
will return him to his home safely with rewards and war booty 
(maal-e-gani-maat)." 
Sahi Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 52, Number 53:
Narrated Anas bin Malik: The Prophet said, "Nobody who dies 
and finds good from Allah (in the Hereafter) would wish to come 
back to this world even if he were given the whole world and 
whatever is in it, except the martyr who, on seeing the superiority 
of martyrdom, would like to come back to the world and get killed 
again (in Allah's Cause)." 
Sahi Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 52, Number 48:
Narrated Anas: The Prophet said, "A single endeavor (of fighting) 
in Allah's Cause in the afternoon or in the forenoon is better than 
all the world and whatever is in it. A place in Paradise as small as 
the bow or lash of one of you is better than all the world and 
whatever is in it. And if a houri from Paradise appeared to the 
people of the earth, she would fill the space between Heaven and 
the Earth with light and pleasant scent and her head cover is better 
than the world and whatever is in it." 
Sahi Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 52, Number 44:
Narrated Abu Huraira: A man came to Allah's Apostle and said, 
"Instruct me as to such a deed as equals Jihad (in reward)." He 
replied, "I do not find such a deed." Then he added, "Can you, 
while the Muslim fighter is in the battle-field, enter your mosque 
to perform prayers without cease and fast and never break your 
fast?" The man said, "But who can do that?" Abu- Huraira added, 
"The Mujahid (i.e. Muslim fighter) is rewarded even for the 
footsteps of his horse while it wanders bout (for grazing) tied in a 
long rope." 
Sahi Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 52, Number 49:
Narrated Samura: The Prophet said, "Last night two men came to 
me (in a dream) and made me ascend a tree and then admitted me 
into a better and superior house, better of which I have never seen. 
One of them said, 'This house is the house of martyrs." 
Sahi Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 52, Number 50:
Narrated Anas bin Malik: The Prophet said, "A single endeavor 
(of fighting) in Allah's Cause in the forenoon or in the afternoon is 
better than the world and whatever is in it." 
Sahi Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 52, Number 42:
Narrated Ibn 'Abbas: Allah's Apostle said, "There is no Hijra (i.e. 
migration) (from Mecca to Medina) after the Conquest (of 
Mecca), but Jihad and good intention remain; and if you are called 
(by the Muslim ruler) for fighting, go forth immediately. 
Sahi Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 52, Number 54:
Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, "By Him in Whose 
Hands my life is! Were it not for some men amongst the believers 
who dislike to be left behind me and whom I cannot provide with 
means of conveyance, I would certainly never remain behind any 
Sariya' (army-unit) setting out in Allah's Cause. By Him in Whose 
Hands my life is! I would love to be martyred in Al1ah's Cause 
and then get resurrected and then get martyred, and then get 
resurrected again and then get martyred and then get resurrected 
again and then get martyred. 
Sahi Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 52, Number 55:
Narrated Anas bin Malik: Prophet of Allah said, "Zaid took the 
flag and was martyred, and then Ja'far took the flag and was 
martyred, and then 'Abdullah bin Rawaha took the flag and was 
martyred too, and then Khalid bin Al-Walid took the flag though 
he was not appointed as a commander and Allah made him 
victorious." The Prophet further added, "It would not please us to 
have them with us." Aiyub, a sub-narrator, added, "Or the Prophet, 
shedding tears, said, 'It would not please them to be with us." 
Sahi Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 52, Number 61:
Narrated Anas:
My uncle Anas bin An-Nadr was absent from the Battle of Badr. 
He said, "O Allah's Apostle! I was absent from the first battle you 
fought against the pagans. (By Allah) if Allah gives me a chance 
to fight the pagans, no doubt. Allah will see how (bravely) I will 
fight." On the day of Uhud when the Muslims turned their backs 
and fled, he said, "O Allah! I apologize to You for what these (i.e. 
his companions) have done, and I denounce what these (i.e. the 
pagans) have done." Then he advanced and Sad bin Muadh met 
him. He said "O Sad bin Muadh ! By the Lord of An-Nadr, 
Paradise! I am smelling its aroma coming from before (the 
mountain of) Uhud," Later on Sad said, "O Allah's Apostle! I 
cannot achieve or do what he (i.e. Anas bin An-Nadr) did. We 
found more than eighty wounds by swords and arrows on his 
body. We found him dead and his body was mutilated so badly 
that none except his sister could recognize him by his fingers." 
Sahi Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 52, Number 63:
Narrated Al-Bara: A man whose face was covered with an iron 
mask (i.e. clad in armor) came to the Prophet and said, "O Allah's 
Apostle! Shall I fight or embrace Islam first? "The Prophet said, 
"Embrace Islam first and then fight." So he embraced Islam, and 
was martyred. Allah's Apostle said, A Little work, but a great 
reward. "(He did very little (after embracing Islam), but he will be 
rewarded in abundance)." 
Sahi Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 52, Number 64:
Narrated Anas bin Malik: Um Ar-Rubai'bint Al-Bara', the mother 
of Hartha bin Suraqa came to the Prophet and said, "O Allah's 
Prophet! Will you tell me about Hartha?" Hartha has been killed 
(i.e. martyred) on the day of Badr with an arrow thrown by an 
unidentified person. She added, "If he is in Paradise, I will be 
patient; otherwise, I will weep bitterly for him." He said, "O 
mother of Hartha! There are Gardens in Paradise and your son got 
the Firdausal-ala (i.e. the best place in Paradise)." [What could be 
a bigger bluffing and exploitation of a poor ignorant mother (who 
lost her son in Jihad) by our merciful Prophet?] 
Mishkat al-Masabih, trans. by James Robson (Lahore: Ashraf, 
1975) Vol. 1:807.
Abu ˜Abs reported God™s messenger as saying, "No man whose 
feet become dusty in God™s path will be touched by hell." Bukhari 
transmitted it. 
Mishkat al-Masabih, Vol. 1:814.
Al-Miqdam b. Madikarib reported God™s messenger as saying, 
"The martyr receives six good things from God: he is forgiven at 
the first shedding of his blood, he is shown his abode in paradise, 
he is preserved from the punishment in the grave, he is kept safe 
from the greatest terror, he has placed on his head the crown of 
honour a ruby which is better than the world and what it contains, 
he is married to seventy-two wives of the maidens with large dark 
eyes, and is made intercessor for seventy of his relatives." 
Tirmidhi and Ibn Majah transmitted it. 
D. Jihad as per Islamic-historians/Scholars/Philosophers: 
We can find hundreds of books written by well-known Islamic 
authorities (Islamic thinker) on Jihad. A few examples of 
historical events and comments should be enough to lay the 
foundation that Jihad in Islamic history was primarily a Holy War 
against the infidels. Here are some examples: 
In his book, œ Jurisprudence in Muhammad™s Biography the 
Azhar scholar, Dr. Muhammad Sa™id Ramadan al-Buti wrote the 
following: œThe Holy War (Islamic Jihad), as it is known in 
Islamic Jurisprudence, is basically an offensive war. This is the 
duty of Muslims in every age when the needed military power 
becomes available to them. This is the phase in which the 
meaning of Holy war has taken its final form. Thus the apostle of 
God said: ' I was commanded to fight the people until they believe 
in Allah and his messages¦..(page 134, 7th edition) . 
Azhar scholar Dr. Buti adds in the same book (page-263): The 
apostle of Allah started to send military detachments from among 
his followers to the various Arab tribes which were scattered in 
the Arab Peninsula to carry out the task of calling (these tribes) to 
accept Islam. If they did not respond, they (Muslims) would kill 
them. That was during the 7th Hgira year. The number of the 
detachments amounted to ten. 
The Baydawi quoted in his book (The lights of Revelation, page-
252): œFight Jews and Christians because they violated the origin 
of their faith and they do not believe in the religion of the truth 
(Islam), which abrogated all other religions. Fight them until they 
pay the poll-tax (Ziziya tax) with submission and humiliation. 
In another place of his book (The Jurisprudence in Muhammad™s 
Biography) Al-Buti (published in Egypt) quoted: œThe concept of 
Holy War (Jihad) in Islam does not take into consideration 
whether defensive or an offensive war. Its goal is the exaltation of 
the Word of Allah and the construction of Islamic society and the 
establishment of Allah™s Kingdom on Earth regardless of the 
means. The means would be offensive warfare. In this case, it is 
the apex, the noblest Holy War. It is legal to carry on a Holy 
War. 
Ibn Hisham-Al Sohaily quoted in his famous book (Al- Rawd al- 
Anaf, page-50,51 ): " No two religions are to exist in the Arab 
Peninsula . Therefore, Saudi Government does not allow any 
other religion to manifest their religious task. What a tolerant and 
peaceful religion Islam is! 
The well-known Egyptian scholar, Sayyid Qutb, (Sayyid Qutb, 
Milestones, Revised Edition, chapter. 4, œJihaad in the Cause of 
God") notes four stages in the development of jihad:
*   While the earliest Muslims remained in Mecca before 
    fleeing to Medina, God did not allow them to fight; 
2. Permission is given to Muslims to fight against their 
oppressors;
*   God commands Muslims to fight those fighting them; 
*   God commands the Muslims to fight against all 
    polytheists. 
Sayyid Qutb views each stage to be replaced by the next stage in 
this order, the fourth stage to remain permanent). To justify the 
universal and permanent dimensions of jihad he cites the 
following Qur™anic passages: 
Quran: 4:74-32: They ought to fight in the way of God who have 
sold the life of this world for the life of the Hereafter; and 
whoever fights in the way of God and is killed or becomes 
victorious, to him shall We (God) give a great reward...
Quran: 8:38-40: and fight them until there is no oppression and the 
religion is wholly for God....
Quran: 9:29-32: Fight against those among the People of the Book 
(Jews and Christians) who do not believe in God and the Last 
Day, who do not forbid what God and His messenger have 
forbidden, until they are subdued and pay jizyah (tax on non-
Muslims) ... 
Sayyid Qutb, however, pours scorn upon those who view jihad as 
solely defensive:
... They are ignorant of the nature of Islam and of its function, and 
that it has a right to take the initiative for human freedom. Thus 
wherever an Islamic community exists which is a concrete 
example of the Divinely-ordained system of life, it has a God-
given right to step forward and take control of the political 
authority so that it may establish the Divine system on earth, 
while it leaves the matter of belief to individual conscience. 
Maulana Mawdudi™s Fatwa: 
Likewise, the popular Pakistani Muslim revivalist Abu™l Ala 
Mawdudi rejects any distinction between offensive and defensive 
jihad. So also, the distinguished contemporary Pakistani scholar, 
Fazlur Rahman, while recognizing the extensive presence of jihad 
in the Qur™an, rejects the stand of those modern Muslim 
apologists who have tried to explain the jihad of the early 
(Muslim) Community in purely defensive terms (Fazlur Rahman, 
Islam (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979) 37). 
According to the Encyclopaedia of Islam, "the fight is obligatory 
even when the unbelievers have not started it (E. Tyan, œDjihad, 
Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd ed. (Leiden: Brill, 1965). In the 
words of Rudolph Peters the "ultimate aim of jihad is ˜the 
subjection of the unbelievers™ and ˜the extirpation of unbelief™" 
(Rudolph Peters, œJihad, The Encyclopedia of Religion 
(NewYork: Macmillan, 1987) Vol. 8:88-91). 
All of these authorities simply echo Islam™s fundamental 
assumption that world sovereignty must be in the hands of 
Muslims.
Quran: 16:101: And when We put a revelation in place of 
(another) revelation, “ and Allah knoweth best what He revealeth 
“ they say: Lo! thou art but inventing. Most of them know not.
On the basis of these verses there arose within the Muslim 
community the principle of Qur™anic interpretation, called naskh 
("abrogation") which stipulated that earlier peaceful verses could 
be abrogated by later militant verses, i.e., in the case of jihad the 
Meccan verses were abrogated by the Medinan verses. It is well 
known that many Muslim scholars in the early history of Islam 
contended that Qur™an 9:5, sometimes called "the verse of the 
sword", abrogated a host of peaceful passages in earlier portions 
of the Qur™an. 
What it has signified in the past and signifies at present for masses 
of Muslims is well summarized in a statement by the world 
renowned Ibn Khaldun (A.D. 1332-1406), Islam™s great historian, 
sociologist and philosopher:
In the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, 
because of the universalism of the (Muslim) mission and (the 
obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or 
by force. Therefore, caliphate and royal authority are united in 
(Islam), so that the person in charge can devote the available 
strength to both of them at the same (Ibn Khaldun, The 
Muqaddimah, trans. by Franz Rosenthal (New York: Pantheon 
Books Inc., 1958) Vol. 1:473). 
(The Translation of the Meanings of Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 
1:xxiv-xliii ).
So, it is incumbent upon us (Muslims) to follow the path which 
Allah™s Messenger (Muhammad) adopted to avoid polytheism and 
heresy in all its shapes and to take the Holy Qur™an and the 
Prophet™s Traditions as torches in front of us to guide us. We have 
to teach our brethren and convey the Message to non-Muslims all 
over the world as much as possible in order to save them from the 
Hell-fire. We have to prepare ourselves to stand in the face of our 
enemy and to possess the means of power and to participate in the 
progress of useful industries in order to protect our religion and be 
powerful enough to face our enemy, as Allah, the Elevated says in 
Surat al-Anfal (8:60):
Qur™an: 8:60: Against them (kaffirs) make ready your strength to 
the utmost of your power, including steeds of war (tanks, places, 
missiles and other weapons, etc.) to strike terror into the (hearts 
of) the Enemy of Allah and your enemy, and others beside, whom 
you may not know, but whom Allah does know. Whatever you 
shall spend in the Cause of Allah, shall be repaid to you, and you 
shall not be treated unjustly
How many terrorists would appeal to this verse "to strike terror 
into the hearts of the enemy"? 
The majority of the Qur™an™s texts themselves clearly identify 
jihad as physical warfare in Islam and, Islamically, God™s way of 
establishing the Kingdom of God on earth. Likewise, from the 
Hadith and the earliest biographies of Muhammad it is just as 
evident that the early Muslim community understood these 
Qur™anic texts to be taken literally. Historically, therefore, from 
the time of Muhammad onwards, jihad as physical warfare in 
support of the message of Islam has been a reality for the Muslim 
community. Hence, it comes as no surprise when even terrorists 
(Osama and his al-Qaeda) easily appeal to these source materials 
to justify their actions, not to speak of their teachers who teach the 
theory and the art of terrorism. September 11, 2001, terrorist act 
in the soil of America is the glittering example of Jihadi mindset 
of Islamist like Osama bin Laden. 
Qur™anic Ayats (I just mentioned above) and numerous Sahi 
Hadiths of same kind were instrumental for Muslims to dedicate 
their strength & minds for the cause of Islam. Therefore, in the 
name of spreading the religion, devout Muslim fighters killed 
millions of people while occupying neighboring Arab lands such 
as Syria, Jordan, Palestine, Egypt, Iraq and non-Arab countries 
like India, Turkey, Libya, Iran etc. Even Spain had fallen into 
their hands for hundreds of years. I simply wonder were these 
wars defensive. Were those swords used by Islamic soldiers to 
occupy country after country be considered a symbol of 
forgiveness or mercy? Following Muhammad™s death, his 
companions fought each other in relentless savage wars 
competing for authority. 
In summary, Islamic Jihad with the help of Islamic sword--
hundreds of tribes were wiped out from the Arabian Peninsula. 
Thousands were orphaned and widowed. Hazzaz bin Yousuf 
killed more than a hundred thousand Sahabis, Ibne Khattal was 
killed in Kaba™a. Later Abdulla Bin Zubair was killed in the same 
Kaba™a. By the end of the first civil war of Muslims, all the Badari 
Sahabis were killed. By the end of three civil wars all the Sahabis 
were killed "it sucked up all the strength of Muslims" ( Bokhari). 
Ten thousand Muslims were killed in the Jamal war between 
Hazrat Ali (RA) and Bibi Ayesha (RA). Islamic scholar Dr. Abu 
Zayd Shalabi claimed in his book (page-75), in the ˜battle of 
Alees™ which took place on the border of Iraq, the great Islamic 
General Khalid killed 70,000 people. 
Thousands of non-Muslims were killed. After the death of Prophet 
Muhammad, there were four most favorite disciples of Prophet 
who ruled the Islamic kingdom established by the prophet 
Muhammad, who were known as the most pious caliphs. Out of 
these four Caliphs”three of them were brutally assassinated, and 
only one had natural death because of his old age and very short 
rule of the Islamic state. Karbala was flooded with blood with a 
roar of "Allahu Akbar!" Was it because of the fact that Islamic 
sword was the sign of Mercy? The fact of the matter is”sword 
can never be the sign of mercy! Period. 
Global Agenda: As I cited various valuable quotes, which clearly 
depicted a special and unique feature, which is totally absent in 
any other monolithic religions of the world. Unlike any other 
world religion”Islam has an ulterior motive in its agenda. Islam 
considers it has a sacred and mandatory God given duty to spread 
Islamic message (Din-e-Islam) to all the inhabitants of the world. 
Their ultimate wishful goal is to convert and bring entire mankind 
under the fold of Islam, the only true religion of Allah. To this 
end”two main groups are working very hard. These two groups 
are: (a) Militant/radical Mullahs, (b) Educated/elite western 
residing true believing Muslims (Muslims of the ummatic groups 
in the west such as: AMC, CAIR, ICNA, ISNA, NABIC etc). Here 
we can exclude group-C Muslims (general God fearing innocent 
gullible Muslims who constitute about 70-80% of the total 
Muslims. 
Both the groups (A & B) have one thing common in their minds. 
That is to convert sufficient peoples to Islam in order to establish 
Islamic Sharia™h or Huhud Laws (Allah™s laws just like Afghan 
Taliban state) as the state governing administration. Here the main 
difference is”group A (Militant/fanatics) is engaged in armed 
struggles (Holy war, Terrorism); and group-B (mainly western 
resident) is engaged in secret and peaceful propagation with sweet 
talks and peaceful persuasion of the gullible western peoples by 
deceitful sermons in the mosques and in various annual and semi-
annual Islamic conferences and meetings (Ummatic conference). 
Both have one last thing in mind”to establish Islamic Sharia™h 
law in the state. 
Conclusion: 
Our gullible and wishful Islamists like that Harvard graduate, 
which we have plenty all over the world, or any other Islamists 
who wants to twist the real practical and historical meaning of 
Jihad to fool the modern world, which we have among educated 
Muslims scattered everywhere, must consider this. If they want to 
give a new twisted meaning “ a sober and politically correct one -- 
of the word Jihad, they had better first change the Qur™an, Hadiths 
and all those Islamic history books available in the library 
throughout the world. Alternatively, they should dump all the 
Islamic history literature into the Daria or sea and re-write a new 
peaceful Islamic history by themselves. Sadly, if they do so, then 
it will be a Reformed Islam, which Mullahs will now allow to 
happen any time soon. Therefore, the Islamic elites, many of who 
visit NFB (News From Bangladesh) on a regular basis, will have 
to swallow their false pride and lick their wounds too. The 
proverbial phrase “ the dogs will be barking, but the caravan will 
pass. Humanity is poised now to get rid of all kinds belief system 
that has crippled the humankind and which never allowed us to 
rich for a higher plane. 
References: 
1. The Holy Qur™an, Translated by A. Yousuf Ali, Published by 
Amana Corporation, Brentwood, Maryland, 1983 
2. Buchari Sharif, Bengali Translation by Maulana Muhammad 
Mustafizur Rahman, Sulemani Printers and Publishers, Dhaka, 
Second edition-1999 
3. Holy Qur™an, Bengali translation by Maulana Muhiuddin khan, 
Khademu Harmain Sharifain, Saudi Arabia, Madina Mannwara, 
1413 Hijri. 
4. The Biography of Muhammad and the Wars (Maghazy) Ibn 
Isaac, Dr. Sohaul Zakkar, dar Al Fekr 
5 The Biography of the Prophet, Ibn Kathir, dar Al Knowledge, 
Beirut 
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:48 MDT