From: Bill Roh (billroh@churchofvirus.com)
Date: Tue Mar 19 2002 - 17:19:24 MST
I take exception with only one point. To me, proof of their origins in the minds of man IS proof that they do not exist.
That seems to me to be the stickiing point between us. Proof of man's creation of gods is evidence that they do not exist.
Why do you think that it is not evidence?
Bill
athe nonrex wrote:
> [Bill Roh]
> >I see Athenonrex
> >
> >So...
> >
> >I say that there are "green frilled nurples" (GFNs) with teats on their heads. They are all powerful, control time and the very laws of physics completely. They exist I say -
> >I'll even write it down - so it carries the same power of human conceptions as "god".
> >
> >Now - prove that GFNs do not exist. HAH - You cannot disprove my GFNs, just like you cannot disprove Zeus, unicorns or dragons.
>
> [athenonrex]
> i never saud i could disprove there existance, i said one could not
> prove the existance or non existance of such beings.
> and i am aware that the concept of gods and deities is a man made
> concept. but without possessing any means of measuring or monitoring
> these "gods" and "deities" we have no way of proving that they
> exist, nor do we have evidence that they do not exist.
>
> _____________________________________________________________
> --->Get your free email @godisdead.com
> Made possible by Fade to Black Comedy Magazine
>
> _____________________________________________________________
> Run a small business? Then you need professional email like you@yourbiz.com from Everyone.net http://www.everyone.net?tag
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:45 MDT