From: Ryan Hebert (dpaladin110@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Feb 28 2002 - 19:38:08 MST
Heh...well....some poeple are "touchy" like that. Here we are, "pointing and
counter-pointing" all sorts of "things" about Chandy and "Mandy," and
ironically, she/he has had no responce...how funny...how to respond
"appropriately?"
However, back to Hermit's "assumption" observation...
This is also an ironic situation...isn't that an assumption and a bit of
hypocrisy...you assume that we simply are "precipitating" these questions
due to the fact that we assume that Chandy is indeed female. And I believe
that Hypocrisy is indeed a sin... You bastard, Hermit! hehe....anywho...
Well...what do I know? I'm just another stupid kid...eh *shrugs*
-me
>From: No name given <vampier@mac.com>
>Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com
>To: virus@lucifer.com
>Subject: Re: virus: Re: Mandy's assignment...
>Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:16:44 -0500
>
>I think she's not likely to answer to "mandy" at all if she said her
>name is chandy.
>
>On Thursday, February 28, 2002, at 05:31 PM, Ryan Hebert wrote:
>
>>Well, between the three of us, Mandy has plenty of questions to answer
>>for [dramatic music in the background]. The idea of impaling us and
>>classifying "weirdling internet collectives" sounds a bit..."out
>>there," if you will. I'm not forking the idea, but I'm guessing the
>>other possibility is a bit more realistic. You're questions will help
>>clear things up, Dr. Sebby.
>>
>>Personally, I'd like to branch off of the first idea, perhaps she is
>>just subscribing and listening to her responces? Recording the data?
>>...As you have suggested, Dr. Sebby. Hmmm...but if that idea was the
>>case, would you think that it would be hard to find a site or database
>>that runs its systematics under her rubric for "necessities"?
>>
>>-me
>
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:44 MDT