RE: virus: Re:What is Google really building?

From: Blunderov (squooker@mweb.co.za)
Date: Wed Jan 02 2002 - 14:07:00 MST

  • Next message: Walter Watts: "virus: Good Stuff in both of these:"

    rhinoceros
    Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 9:02 PM
     [rhinoceros]

    On a remotely related note, I can see that domain-name squatting can
    make money, providing value to the squatters, but can anyone explain how
    this can be justified? What value does the squatter offer in return? My
    closest guess is that it is a result of an abuse of the concept of
    property which has found its way into the legislation. Any other
    explanations?

    [Blunderov] At the risk of being hideously simplistic, does the value
    not derive from simple ownership of a scarce resource? 'Mail' is almost
    indispensable in a domain name that intends to deal in e-mail, and there
    are only 26 letters in the alphabet.

    Is it possible that the very term 'e-mail' has imposed a sort of memetic
    template that is obeyed subconsciously? Or are there more technical
    reasons for the form (n)mail?

    Anyway, taking all this into consideration along with 'money' and
    'information' suggests to me that there is might be a class of abstract
    objects that, in spite of their abstractness, are dealt with as if they
    were in fact concrete. A hybrid meme?

    Any takers?

    Best Regards

    ---
    To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 07 2004 - 15:29:14 MDT