From: Bill Roh (billroh@churchofvirus.com)
Date: Fri Jan 25 2002 - 12:46:19 MST
A little comment for you in regards to your statement: I prefer "Creation by
Committee" because no individual could have possibly
screwed it up this badly alone.
The Universe is perfect by definition - everything that happens happens exactly
as it is supposed to. If one thinks otherwise, they would be mistaken.
Bill
David Hill wrote:
> I don't see why "Divine intervention would violate the 2nd law..." as an
> omnipotent individual could violate, rescind, abrogate or ignore the law he,
> she or it ostensibly set up in the first place.
>
> I prefer "Creation by Committee" because no individual could have possibly
> screwed it up this badly alone. Reality is a C- term project in any self
> respecting God University.
>
> And the claim that "every attempt to explain that model is easily
> disprovable," simply shows that the criteria you accept for proof is not
> sufficiently demanding.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-virus@lucifer.com [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com]On Behalf
> Of Bill Roh
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:29 PM
> To: virus@lucifer.com
> Subject: Re: virus: Kirk: Standing my ground
>
> <SNIP>
> 2> David: "The mounting and single value of the evidence is immaterial
> because
> it takes only one divine intervention to change the result. Could happen at
> any
> time." Bill: Divine intervention would violate the 2nd law of
> thermodynamics -
> which means God would have to exist only in our Universe to operate - and if
> that is the case, tell me which part of our Universe houses heaven and hell.
> The
> Christian model of god is certainly man made as every attempt to expain that
> model is easily disprovable, and in most cases attributable to a particlar
> person.
> <SNIP>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-virus@lucifer.com [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com]On Behalf
> > Of Steele, Kirk A
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 6:40 PM
> > To: 'virus@lucifer.com'
> > Subject: RE: virus: Kirk: Standing my ground
> >
> > no. search for Pascal' wager to understand agnosticism
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:41 MDT