From: David Hill (dhill@spee-dee.com)
Date: Fri Jan 25 2002 - 06:10:03 MST
OK, sounds like we've found Hell.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-virus@lucifer.com [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com]On Behalf
Of joedees@bellsouth.net
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 12:46 AM
To: virus@lucifer.com
Subject: Re: virus: Kirk: Standing my ground
On 24 Jan 2002 at 14:28, Bill Roh wrote:
Hell is arguing theology with an stubborn obtuse fundy.
>
> Here is why the argument is flawed IMO
>
> 1> Believing is not enough to win God's favor in any religion I am aware
of. One
<SNIP>
> Bill
>
> David Hill wrote:
>
> > I scanned the text at plato.stanford.edu/entries/pascal-wager#1 to
confirm
<SNIP>
> > Of course we can't speak of the second and third meta-Gods (Moe and
Curley).
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-virus@lucifer.com [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com]On Behalf
> > Of Steele, Kirk A
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 6:40 PM
> > To: 'virus@lucifer.com'
> > Subject: RE: virus: Kirk: Standing my ground
> >
> > no. search for Pascal' wager to understand agnosticism
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:41 MDT