From: Yash (yashk2000@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Jan 20 2002 - 00:08:17 MST
I did show:
1. The fallacies of his thinking with references from Ruggiero's textbook as
I asserted,
2. His biases using the Kepler/Newton analogy
3. References from a historical research work by Georges Ifrah which show
there was already three types of knowledge encoding schemes at the time
Haridatta dies, which Hermit conveniently chose (a) not to completely read
or (b) not to respond to.
4. That this was a result of his trying to avoid the issue at hand (doing
the same kind of encoding scheme in a new language, which I revised to make
it in english), to which he hasn't contributed the slightest.
On the other hand, all the assertions he made about the work even before he
reaad it have to be abcked up by him (he has tried to shift the burden of
proof several times, notably systematically using a Pi chronology which I
supposedly asserted along hte line, (this is masqueraded as an investigation
diversion), and then finally recently asking me to show a date!!! Which only
proves my point: there wasn't any to begin with.
But then, if you do like him and do not read how I showed the fallacies nor
the references, what can I do?
Yash.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-virus@lucifer.com [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com]On Behalf
Of Kalkor
I hate to sound like I'm taking sides or some other utism, but the burden of
making your assertions worth reading to me falls solely on you. I've seen
Hermit back up every one of his assertions with facts, which he also gave me
access to rather than merely stating their existance. I've seen the same
from several others, but not from Yash.
>>>>
Please, Yash. Do not respond to this with more assertions that you are
unwilling or unable to back up.
>>>>
Agreed.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:40 MDT