From: Steele, Kirk A (SteeleKA@nafm.misawa.af.mil)
Date: Fri Jan 18 2002 - 16:40:36 MST
Heresy? No.
As of yet, undeveloped psychosocial perspective formation? Yes.
A clear lack of comprehension of the epistemological underpinnings of the
distinction between the domains of knowledge and belief? Yes
But these are not pathological, and as such can be remedied with simple self
discovery and learning.
Kirk Steele
-----Original Message-----
From: Blunderov [mailto:squooker@mweb.co.za]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 3:07 AM
To: virus@lucifer.com
Subject: RE: virus: RE:The lying fuckwit has too much time and too
little intelligence...
Mermaid quoted
"I maintain that Truth is a pathless land, and you cannot approach it by any
path whatsoever, by any religion, by any sect. That is my point of view, and
I adhere to that absolutely and unconditionally."Krishnamurti
Without in anyway wishing to introduce yet another red-herring, I have to
say-
But surely he contradicts his own self here? He makes a pretty emphatic
implied statement that truth cannot be attained and yet he holds this
statement to be true. Haven't we seen this before?
The main point being:
Every religion has to, in the final analysis, hold an item of faith.
Even the viriians. The viriians hold (I think) the item of faith that the
scientific method of thought is the best way forward for humanity.
The scientific system of thought cannot prove itself to be true. It would of
neccessity be self referencing.You have to subscribe.
Or does Blunderov speak heresy here?
Regards
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:40 MDT