From: Steele, Kirk A (SteeleKA@nafm.misawa.af.mil)
Date: Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:56:03 MST
http://www.moltisantifamily.homestead.com/family.html
well, we can see a clear precedant for engagement in the egoistic forwarding
of this person as ego prima fascia. Clearly a demonstrable event in the
prevalance of the persaonl fable stage of egoistic development.
Seeing this gives me cause to reconsider this a a fabrication of Yash. But
clearly a liked minded purveyor of self importance.
Kirk
-----Original Message-----
From: BIll Roh [mailto:billroh@churchofvirus.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:42 AM
To: virus@lucifer.com
Subject: Re: virus: SOMEBODY is plagiarizing themselves
That is odd now, isn't it. I thought Orlando was Roly too. A little
clarification would be nice.
and it's not just a couple of lines, but the whole thing.
what's up?
Bill
"Steele, Kirk A" wrote:
> My question, are these two new personae, fabrications of Yash himself?
>
> LOOK AT THE FIRST COUPLE OF LINES
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Orlando Moltisanti [ mailto:xipirho@runbox.com
> <mailto:xipirho@runbox.com> ]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:02 AM
> To: virus@lucifer.com
> Cc: Yash
> Subject: virus: Symbols (and mailing list)
>
> Hey Yash, sorry i didn't reply for ages. About the "dj" thing, that's
> exactly what i was trying to ask! - i was reading on some site that the j
> sound in job was pretty much dj, so i thought, to minimise the need for
new
> letters (and hopefully minimise opposition to my scheme by doing so), i
> could just use dj and tc for English "j" and "ch". I really wasn't sure
> about this idea and thought that mayber new characters were in fact
needed.
> As i wasn't convinced either way, i chose to seek others opinions, ie: you
> folks! I do think that perhaps tc for ch is ok, as ch is already two
letters
> in english, but i agree that dj is slightly different. I had thought of a
> symol that is a combination of d and j that could be used - a j with a d
> bulge on the left hand side. I will send images of the symbol idea (well
> actually the symbol ideas - ch and dj) to you (Yash) if you want. The list
> idea sounds excellent, as virus is a bit of a broad base for some of these
> kinds of discussions and co!
> uld be a bit tedious for members, not to mention the fact that perhaps
more
> specialists would be attracted. If you set it up, i'll join, cheers yash!
>
> P.S: I've got some other little decisions to make about charcters too and
a
> list on which to discuss them would be great!
>
> Then look at this one from the other day
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xipirho [ mailto:xipirho@runbox.com <mailto:xipirho@runbox.com> ]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:17 AM
> To: virus@lucifer.com
> Subject: Re:RE: virus: Symbols! (and mailing list)
>
> Hey Yash, sorry i didn't reply for ages. About the "dj" thing, that's
> exactly what i was trying to ask! - i was reading on some site that the j
> sound in job was pretty much dj, so i thought, to minimise the need for
new
> letters (and hopefully minimise opposition to my scheme by doing so), i
> could just use dj and tc for English "j" and "ch". I really wasn't sure
> about this idea and thought that mayber new characters were in fact
needed.
> As i wasn't convinced either way, i chose to seek others opinions, ie: you
> folks! I do think that perhaps tc for ch is ok, as ch is already two
letters
> in english, but i agree that dj is slightly different. I had thought of a
> symol that is a combination of d and j that could be used - a j with a d
> bulge on the left hand side. I will send images of the symbol idea (well
> actually the symbol ideas - ch and dj) to you (Yash) if you want. The list
> idea sounds excellent, as virus is a bit of a broad base for some of these
> kinds of discussions and co!
> uld be a bit tedious for members, not to mention the fact that perhaps
more
> specialists would be attracted. If you set it up, i'll join, cheers yash!
>
> P.S: I've got some other little decisions to make about charcters too and
a
> list on which to discuss them would be great!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:39 MDT