From: Bill Roh (billroh@churchofvirus.com)
Date: Mon Jan 14 2002 - 11:32:59 MST
I suppose you could look at it that way. I think though that our silly society
has attempted to give children the storybook line about "For everyone there is
one true love" bullshit. I don't know what asshole first made that one up - they
deserve a good beating. Finding love the first time is cool only in that it
floods your brain with the best chemicals the body makes. But I think the wise
person knows this - and realizes that there are virtually an infinite amount
love options available. Take advantage of the feeling is my advise - love all
you can!
Bill
PS - i do like the analogy of "falling into step with". I do not think any
particular love is a decision - but allowing yourself the option to love may be
a choice. If it is selfish, so what?
Dr Sebby wrote:
> ....perhaps we fall in love but once in our lives but it is realized
> throughout our lives embodied in many people?
>
> drsebby.
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "Blunderov" <squooker@mweb.co.za>
> Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com
> To: <virus@lucifer.com>
> Subject: RE: virus: more important than love?
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:16:54 +0200
>
> This hedonist believes that pleasure is the most important thing in life.
> One of the most importanr things about pleasure is that it implies a lack of
> pain!
> Not too many creatures are fond of pain.
>
> The Mermaid said it well when she said that falling in love is a selfish
> decision.
> Many seem to think that "falling in love" is like stumbling into an
> unexpected tiger-pit in the jungle.
> Really it is more like to "falling into step" with someone.(Quite often this
> decision
> depends on whether the other person seems willing to be fallen into step
> with.)
>
> IMHO
>
> Blunderov
>
> DrSebby.
> "Courage...and shuffle the cards".
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:39 MDT